Skip Navigation

Posts
11
Comments
1707
Joined
2 yr. ago

techno hippie

  • And an old reputation for hiding their ISO downloads buried deep in the website.

  • Yep.

    I've yet to see suse without yast.

    I don't even know what that means.

    Suse, without yast!??? But.... Yast's what makes Suse so great!

    Has something the same but better come along?

  • It's kinda part of the original point... to make a complete free software operating system...

    Still, was nice that the Linux kernel came along to make things easier than the more advanced approach Hurd was taking.

    Linux Libre + GNU, and got the point of GNU none the less. :)

  • Similar experience.

    Except, props to the BSDs (especially OpenBSD), for being so much more coherent systems, as perhaps seen best (or at least easiest) in its man pages.

  • I have.

    It was fine.

    This was way back around 2014 iirc.

  • Must be true.

    No one's accepting your invite for a fight.

  • Can't be. One can use the Hurd, and it wont hurt [much]. Not like the corporate enshitified proprietary malware operating systems.

  • What's the agreement say when installing / first starting a chromeos?

    ... If I recall correctly, it too has a deal with the devil clause, and demands you doxx yourself to the machine before you get to use it.

    Better/worse, becomes meaningless when it's already beyond what's fit to use.

  • That has to be it.

    The super secret super chad level above.

  • I know this.

  • PLEASE! PLEASE UNIVERSE! BRING BACK IRIX!

    (and more than just nekoware... I mean a full, fully-FOSS, IRIX.)

    \dreamer

  • Both got the deal with the devil clauses in their end user agreements, right? That's bad enough it does not even matter who's better or worse after that. That's already bad enough to not be fit to use.

  • Bu' Bubunbu's more reliable. Different reasons to dislike. Manjy may be manjy and janky, but bubunbu's got an insane corporation behind it doing all the pop enshitification things.

  • Yeah.

    I was not wrong for having suse be my os when I made the leap as a windows refugee in late 2003. It'd still be a great choice for windows refugees these days. Perhaps even the best choice.

    You highlight why, very well.

    OpenSUSE (and even the corporate version) deserve more praise. They seemed to get out-marketed by Ubuntu. But did not get beat for a better OS.

  • I did for about 4 years as a fresh refugee.

    I couldn't keep living with normal, for suse.

    I needed the schizo chad one.

  • And Gentoo's not schizo...

    Nor are the rest on that tier... except the one. We all know which one.

  • Alpine and Slack?

    Arch and Artix?

    Void and OpenBSD?

    Oh tell us why...

    It's not just that you use Gentoo, and your schizophrenia has nothing to do with using Gentoo that you mean, is it? And if so, presumably, your chad'ness likewise, your own, not because of Gentoo, yes?

  • Void's for sure one of the undersung heroes of the distrosphere.

    It's my first go-to.

    So very surprising, as it has been since it was still new, how well stocked it is. And so very reliable, to not have stupid package names. It's a little touch I very much appreciate.

    Big love to voidlinux.

    Respect, that it makes it to top tier.

  • Wait, what?

    Why is Gentoo top and schizo? ... And why's artix, openbsd, and slackware in schizo too? ... TemplOS, obviously. But why did the others get misplaced there?

    Makes me all the more want to install CRUX, ~ an idea I toyed with yesterday. Where would CRUX go on this tier list?

    ::: spoiler PS, btw: Bedrock with Artix, Devuan, Gentoo & Void.

    ... My OS has split personality, hears many voices of different package managers.

    EEeeeeeeheheheheheheheh. (* )u( *)