- 0 Posts
- 18 Comments
Bitch I’m a lycanthrope
I had the same thought initially. I haven’t read the article, but assuming this picture isn’t fake they might be including artists from his last two campaigns. Rogers did in 2020, Bowie and Prince died in 2016
2·3 months agoI found it. Dude ran for sheriff in 2015 and it came up then too.
I want to know how that teacher illegally obtained $20,000 from Taco Bueno in 2012
2·3 months agoUsually I avoid internet arguments, these arguments were so bad though that I couldn’t resist
I cannot stress this enough. The EU isn’t trying to keep people from going to the site. They’re just saying if
the people running the siteElon Musk knowingly use it to spread false information they will be legally liable.
I can’t help replying to this.
Depends on how you build the site, my dude. You can easily code it to block everyone and then putting in exceptions takes extra effort.
How many more rakes do you want to step on?
3·3 months agoYour comment is too far down this list
The internet is indeed international, and also very much subject to territorial law. This is not new.
If you bother to read the article or the letter, no one is trying to keep people from accessing the site. They want X as a site to stop actively and knowingly pushing false information.
Imperialism is bad, so we have common ground there. However, not really relevant here.
Sincerely, have a good one and take care of yourself.
I really don’t understand your point at all. The EU sent them a letter pointing out that they have new laws and will be enforcing them. It’s on X to follow those laws, not follow them and pay the consequences, or geofence their service.
If Europeans want to go the site they will if its blocked or not, if it’s geofenced or not. VPNs exist. The point isn’t blocking X or preventing people from reaching it. It’s serving notice that they will be subject to the law
And it’s not like there’s one big ISP run by the EU where they can flip a switch to block X. They’d have to force each ISP to do it.
Ok… but your analogy doesn’t make any sense in this context. X isn’t eating lunch next to the EU. They’re selling sandwiches over the internet in the EU. The EU sent a letter pointing out that his sandwiches in the past have contained shit and we now have laws in place regarding shit filled sandwiches, so do not sell sandwiches that contain shit within our borders or we will pursue legal action against you.
Also, quit your bullshit. If the EU just blocked it outright there’d be a huge outcry about them censoring free speech.
I mean, pornhub pulled access to their website from my state and others because of state laws. Surely it couldn’t be that hard for X
Does a Gacha count as gambling? I’m still missing some ZZZ Agents and some Nikkes
I fucking hated that movie. My 4 year old only laughed at the YouTube cat videos they spliced in occasionally.
14·6 months agohttps://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.freeplay.twerk
The ad is actually pretty accurate to the gameplay except any character in a skirt is wearing shorts under it so you don’t actually get the kind of visual that’s in OP’s screenshot.
It’d be a pretty entertaining game if it weren’t so cancerous with ads every ten seconds
Legitimately my biggest complaint about Cyberpunk 2077. Was a huge relief when they added the system to glamor gear
This guy doesn’t know about stackies