You should specify "in humans" because, biologically, there's a lot of species that can and do swap sexes. Not any mammals as far as I know, but it would help your case when arguing biology if you apply the most accurate phrasing possible.
No idea if you knew it was possible in other animals or not, just pointing it out.
There's another thing that needs pointing out.
Biologically, a female labeling is based on a set of traits, with the word being defined by those traits.
Socially a female is a term defined by usage and tradition. Currently, female is indeed the term for any animal that is sexually dimorphic and matches a set of traits. But a woman is defined by a set of traits, that includes the traits of a female human, but also includes other traits.
And making a post warning users of blahaj is transparency. It's coming to users and saying : here is an administrative decision being made, here is the rationale behind that decision.
There's no need to link, copy, or otherwise bring up the original comment when the decision is based on the choices of other instances. It would be nice yeah, but not mandatory for transparency.
Kinda have to, since none of the "leftist" ideologies has any chance of hell of being bought into action without revolution.
Since revolution requires some degree of violence, and established states have access to not just man portable firearms, but bigger guns as well, then attempting to use violence to change said state without access to firearms is what you might call dumb. You might call it suicidal. You might call it a form of Darwinism whereby the truly stupid leftists get killed off by whatever government they're going at so that the non-stupid leftists that are left breed smarter babies that will then realize that without equal access to arms, no populace can revolt.
I guess you don't have to like guns. It is possible to dislike something immensely and still use it as a tool. Like toothpaste. It tastes weird, it's not fun to use, but without it, you have no teeth eventually. Guns are like toothpaste, your squeeze them and weird things come out, but at least your teeth are clean.
I dunno, I'm an ex smoker. If I'm near a cigarette, that crap messes with me.
But vapers? I've had to tell a few off for not watching where they blow, but it is absolutely not the same as smoke. It doesn't trigger the same responses, it doesn't speed up my heart, clog my sinuses, our send me into a sneezing bout. I'd defer to any coherent data on its effects, but in terms of being intrusive, it just isn't the same.
Ho-lee-shit!