Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)H
Posts
39
Comments
149
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I don't know about proud, but you sure should be content.

  • Your astroturfing reads so strongly like sarcasm I almost upvoted.

    I honestly thought "There's no way anyone, paid or brainwashed, would post such a thing and mean it".

  • I'm assuming they meant "talking to the parent, using less complicated, more mainstream words, even if the meaning is a little wrong as a result".

    Which in my opinion is an ok approach, even though this specific parent, just by posting here, appears tech- and lgbt- savvy enough to probably know at least some terms.

    Also, they could have just said 'not trans' instead, if 'cis' would be too advanced.

    Actually scratch that, I get using "straight" as non-lgbt. It is how is very commonly used outside of lgbt circles.

    But not a bad thought on its own. just maybe a bit othering.

  • I mean, nearly all of them do, tbh. Especially the last one.

  • The breeding kink option

  • uBlock Origin -Iceberg edition-

  • RuLe

    Jump
  • Ado rules

  • jpg go boo

  • Yep, this is the feeling

  • Shit that's interesting. What's the context? What were those edits?

  • The political blockading 5 years ago was sobering news.

    This is watching a really, really, really big train crash, after knowing for minutes that the driver was accelerating on purpose.

    This was predicted and expected.

  • Wanted to share, because it worked for me

  • A "truly small" creator, would get , I dunno, let's say 5% of Disney's marketed sales, after being stolen from, from being known as the guy Disney stole from. Which would be enormously more than if he only had his "truly small" marketing.

    A more successful and known creator, who would market himself more broadly on his own, would not be easy to steal from, since it would be quick enough for the stealing to be found out, to dampen Disney sales.

    And all this, ignores the paradigm shift in monetisation (Uniquenameosaurus YouTube video), that could enhance this process immensely, and allow artist creativity to flourish even more, without even leaving the diseased economical rules of capitalism.

    Also about this,

    As opposed to now where the original artist/author at least has some recourse against the big corporation. Versus none.

    Guns give some recourse to poor people, against the rich, because anyone could use a gun.

    Guns allow the rich to equip their personal security teams, with guns.

    Guns are not helping the poor, and neither does copyright.

  • Ah, shoulda gone with my first instinct, I don't know why I expected anything cishet from this community lol

  • I'm about 101% sure it's possible, +-1.1%

  • I don't get the joke.

    Is it anal prep?

    Am I too gay to get it?

  • Disney wins in that scenario, because they have more resources to spend on getting their media out there.

    As... Opposed to now?

    If Disney does plagiarize small artists' work, and becomes known for it, they take a reputation hit, and the artist gets an explosion of exposure, as long as it is provable he made the original story. (Disney making million-dollar budget movies of your OC, isn't even that bad for you, to be honest, but let's assume that it doesn't market the fuck out of your small artist story. In real life, stories are not in competition.)

    If Disney doesn't, then it's an undeniable positive for worldwide creativity.

    The only thing copyright protects, is big companies' exclusive right to public-consciousness characters.

    1. The current system doesn't protect small writers either. Look at the amount of money plagiarism gets you, with copyright law in effect.

    And

    1. at the stage where you're big enough for copyright to effectively protect you, provable publication dates take care of that problem through reputation. If you become known(read: found out) as a plagiarist, you get the boot from the public zeitgeist, never to receive public money again.

    Copyright only protects the Mouse's bottom line, and strangleholds creativity.

  • That's year round.