No. However, the FDP are basically terrorists at this point and will stop at nothing to praise the „Schwarze Null“
No. However, the FDP are basically terrorists at this point and will stop at nothing to praise the „Schwarze Null“
France has repeatedly tried to hand over shared control of those nukes to Germany. I’d argue that this alliance is set in stone.
Europe is a nuclear power with second strike capability. „Practically disarmed„ is rather different
It’s an investment? Just like an office building or a company car?
Depends. Is it stable? Does it pose a threat to passer bys ?
I‘d have to get my tables from work. It highly depends on the species, soil, size, location, age, natural area of the species and so forth. A decently sized oak at around 100-150 years old usually gets weighed in at around 2000€. Variation however is a given.
Trees prevent soil erosion, keep water clean, provide the basis for many beneficial insects and so forth and so on. They have a giant value in our financial system.
All of these views are valid. A tree has to be seen for what it can provide. If it’s more valuable to society and nature as a tree, leave it be. If other trees can gain from it being removed earlier than its natural decay demands, I’d argue to remove it.
Please don’t.
I’d argue Dresden is rather nice, along with being home to some of these people, it would make them really feel their defeat I think.
So far, „sky“ is pretty nice