CyberEgg

I don't see heated and impassioned debate about the morality, metaphysics, philosophy, spirituality, ethics etc as interpersonal conflict.

If you have two characters with different morals, philosophies, world views etc, and they argue about that, yes, that is interpersonal conflict. Conflict between characters does not have to result in strife, insults, hatred or friendships breaking up.

if you want character development in VOY, look to Kes (at least in her penultimate 2 episodes), 7of9, Tom Paris, B'Lana Torres, Harry Kim, and the Doctor.

Wait, you think these characters had development and arcs? Those were mostly flatlines (besides the Doctor). If younreally think that's character development, that's all I need to know to conclude discussing storytelling and fiction with you is pointless lol. Bye.

in regards to 'not interacting with new users', I think that's a bad idea. how will any community/server/instance grow if you never reply or interact with new accounts?

I mean, they are pretty easy to spot. They are new accounts that instantly drop several news posts. That is not organic human behaviour.

There's one thing I must say, why people don't sweat anymore? For fuck's sake! They were doing sport and all sort of shit, not a single drop of sweat or a speck of dirt.

That is actually a very universal development in movies and shows, and it's part of a bigger problem. Productions are losing texture and visual grip.

You don't do a lot to make me stop laughing.

I haven't watched Academy or care to do so. But thinking there was no interpersonal conflict between Starfleet personnel before or attribute it to being stationed in a borderland... DS9 started with interpersonal conflict between Sisko and Picard. The very appeal of DS9 was a commander/captain who defied Roddenberry's principles. It doesn't matter if that was explained with certain circumstances, it matters that that was part of why DS9 was good (being excellently written didn't do damage either).

I don't recall TNG having nearly every line of dialogue be spitting foul mouthed adhominems in searing hateful tones, like SFA has.

I didn't state anything in that direction, and I couldn't (since I haven't watched Academy). I stated that TNG was best when interpersonal conflict was the vessel the writers conveyed the discussion of philosophies. Or just told interesting stories with.

What an atrocious affront to the guiding principles Gene Roddenberry put in place. No interpersonal conflict??

Lol. If that is your issue with newer Trek, why do you list DS9 as great? Or (later) TNG? VOY is boring, unnecessarily devoid of most character development but still carried much interpersonal conflict. LMAO.

Vergiss nicht den Impfgegner, der Secretary of Health and Human Services ist.

Ah, thanks. I usually don't open images, because why? I don't suspect all images to have such alt texts and there is no indicator (afaik).

Why would he then exclude himself from [parents]?

I thought I made the mouse-over alt-text sufficient.

How does that work in mobile apps like Voyager?

Besides that, I still don't know what you want to say. Do you think Academy is stupid? Do you think fans of the show are stupid? I didn't watch it, why do you think either was stupid, what are your clues?

Der Angriff Bonpflicht war ein BEFEHL!

My 3yo

His moms

they're his parents

I'm confused. Is that now your kid? What's going on?

They should start within their own ranks then. But everyone who keeps looking away is as bad as the rest.

Dass wir eine rechte Regierung haben, hat als Hinweis nicht ausgereicht?

Ist so ein Geschichts-Ding.

Es ist Zucker. Nur aus einer nichtveganen Quelle.

Wenn man so spitzfindig sein wollte, wären es 3(Ente+nte)=3(7/4Ente)=21/4Ente=5¼Ente

In meinen Lebensmitteln kommt kein Milchzucker vor, sofern ich ihn nicht auf einer Zutatenliste, in der man keinen Milchzucker erwartet, überlesen hätte (was unwahrscheinlich ist, weil sowas fett geschrieben wird).