Based on my interactions with you in the past, you were unable to apply this same logic to the genocide in Gaza.
You don’t actually live by the principle you just stated and hypocritically are fine with throwing someone else under the bus to protect yourself.
That was several years ago, though. Hopefully you’ve changed.
Sorry, I will move the goal posts a little. There was no fair primary.
Read the Ballot Access Denial subsection of the controversies section on your link.
The aspect of game theory people who espouse it as their rational for voting blue no matter who only applies to games that occur only once.
What strategy wins in the long term over multiple plays is exactly opposite what they espouse and is closer, though not entirely, the strategy espoused by the people they argue against.
We have elections on a repeated basis.
What primaries? No one voted for Harris in any 2024 primaries.
Hell, then DNC told States that allowed other candidates in the primary ballots that they wouldn’t be counted.
There was no fucking primary. Funny how the ignorant that like to write about game theory like to point to the non-existent primaries as the only appropriate time to try to push the party to the left.
Don’t use the words game theory and harm reduction. You clearly don’t know anything about either.
You are literally ignoring all of game theory based around games with repeated plays. Why? Because it shows the opposite strategy then what you are promoting works better.
When people point out that your vaunted game theory proves you wrong, that is when the phrase harm reduction comes out so you don’t have to argue against people correctly pointing out that your strategy fails in the long term.
It’s not clever, nor is it subtle.
I’m thinking Trump murdered the one man responsible for the IRGC not acquiring nuclear weapons.
You know, the Ayatollah with the fatwa against acquiring nuclear weapons.
It was not. Iran’s military wanted to stay close so that if the religious fatwa the ayatollah pronounced against acquiring nuclear weapons, they’re have one quickly.
Yes, Trump murdered the one man responsible for preventing Iran from having nuclear weapons, and control went to his son who just saw every direct member of his family murdered in front of him.
I thought it was chips for free until my late twenties.
Technically that is basically what all trees are.
Trees are the crabs of the vegetable world.
You apparently are incapable of critical thinking if you don’t recognize political environments existing that drive the engineering of the technology in question. Thus being, wait for it, inherent.
The type of grass that is so predominant is because of stupid social views of what a house/yard is supposed to look like.
The fact that a lot of HOA’s and even some cities ban yards being used to grow anything but grass should tell you have political it is.
As all mentioned by The D Quuuuuill.
Technology is inherently political.
This is something that has been known and taught for decades.
Learning towards bad faith pedant here.
Can’t tell if you’re a bad faith pedant or just indescribably naive.
Look at Delta chat.
Delta chat is the best. Especially with webxdc’s.
I don’t take anything from someone I don’t trust that also explicitly doesn’t use warrant canaries because he says they don’t work in contradiction to every legal authority.
It’s also an issue that they run the signal server on one single AWS region.
It isn’t hard or even all that expensive to run on multiple regions.
… Do you think it is hard to kill civilians?
That’s how racist you are against Russians that you are willing to believe they can’t kill civilians so you can choose to admit that the numbers show they aren’t killing them?
I think you misspelled Israel.
It’s not sea looking. It’s a direct point showing how your sophistry of distinguishing between internal US politics and world politics is wrong.
Pointing out how your main argument is wrong is sea-lioning only if you believe people pointing out that you are incorrect is sea-lioning.
It isn’t.
EDIT: ah, sorry, missed the straight qualifier.
Yes.
If they were a good person with interests similar t to mine and compatible … I don’t know, trauma responses and I was attracted to them.
I tend to be attracted to femininity, but with exceptions. I also am bi, too, though, and old enough that that identity matters to me.