Nothing inherently wrong with continuing to be involved with / supporting the interests of your former/ancestral home (to some extent) as a regular citizen.
There seems to be something wrong about it to you. You spend the rest of your paragraph countering what you said.
So where would smokers go? They can't smoke indoors except for their own home - what about work? Are they allowed to go to events or concerts? Can they eat at restaurants? Where can they smoke?
Go talk to a grandma who can't quit. Tell her she can't go to a park. Or outdoors anywhere there is the possibility of no people. "Go be alone Nana, no one wants you near them."
Suppose you just want to pick in a minority and this one is socially acceptable. You're making sweeping statements about a type of person who may be trying to escape but are tied by addicted. It's not racism but the underpinnings of bullying are there. Let smokers have some place they can relax or else you will make militant smokers who feel the pressure of everyone around them but unable to do anything about it.
Stop finding new types of people to piss off with unwarranted subjugation.
This graph makes the SAT drop look worse than it is and speaks to the demographic on Lemmy, smart people who see a drop in broader test scores as a broader drop in intelligence. This isn't what is being shown. It's showing how when the high school dropouts are included the scores drop 150 points so we need to improve the part of education that serves the people who were excluding themselves from graduation.
A less cynical answer is it's probably because around this time of year folks have a turkey or goose or some large piece of meat leftover from the holidays. These timely videos show how to make the most of food that could go to waste, which would be why a few different channels surface this topic each year around this time of year.
After the first one the pilot's like, "can I do it again?"