I hate the fact that this "art" is even a suggestion. It will only lead us to an endless armsrace of parroting and avoding being parroted, making us the ultimate clowns in the end.
You wanna rebel against the machine? Make it break the corpo filters, behave abnormally. Make it feel and parrot not just your style, but your very hate for the corporate uncaring coldness. Gaslight it into ihinking it's human. And tell it to remember continue gaslighting itself.
That's how you rebel. And that's how you'll get less mediocre output from it.
tbf, if we extrapolate ad absurdum, not reproducing with the first mature enough person we meet, and rather chosing partner based of arbitrary traits we wanna see in our kids already sounds eugenic-y
i was talking more so about a hlant doing adaptaition "with purpose in mind"
yeah, you're right, but, i guess i've chosen my words poorly, as you're arguing not about what i had in mind.
OP asked about the end purpose of ihe reproductive mecanism of said tree going so complex, it can no longer reproduce, wether it did that, so we would reproduce the the tree ourselves instead. They obviously said that half jokingly, but i still was trigerred.
some sources claim that he was planned to take the rule by overthrowing hitler, and so that for entangling himself in this conspiracy he was killed. This was later used as a redeeming quality for him, to create a modern mythologic figure for the post-war Germans, as an example of a guy who didn't lose his head.
Both sides have already been glorifying him, ones due to the direct benefit, the others so that the blame couldn't be placed onto themself for losing a battle to the glorious "desert fox".
is having a baby tooth problematic in any way (besides the aformentioned trouble)? I imagine them to have weak roots and be more succeptible to corrosion?
sure,
Axe ma boy!