Pardon, but some people want to eat shit and watch others do it. Some people still use facebook. I don't judge them. But won't be happy if they showed up and told me that i must do it as well.
And those features being what exactly? A small chat window drop-out so your lazy ass won't need to open an ai chat in a tab? This is absurd.
At least they give you a choice of enabling/disabling that functionality
lmao. That's how we got Windows as enshittified as it is now.
lmao. You fail to beat the fanboy allegations with this comment. At this point you literally look like the guy from the meme in my eyes.
and again with the misuse of the word "propaganda", this time topped off with the most basic demagogic manipulation i've seen in a while, comparing me to corpos, trying to... What exactly? Is the last paragraph there to make me feel bad? Because it provides no logical counter-argument to what i said. Sorry, but i'm too autistic to be ragebaited.
You're the one, making claims without supporting them with any proof.
My claim is that firefox gets worse by adding the features nobody asked for, spending time and money for their development, purely out of FOMO of the AI hypetrain, while struggling to implement actually relevant modern technologies such as WebGPU. AI can be a useful instrument, but if i ever want to use it, i'd use specialized tools for that, and look for them at specialized places.
Firefox will grow from a browser into a broader ecosystem of trusted software. Firefox will remain our anchor. It will evolve into a modern AI browser and support a portfolio of new and trusted software additions.
a quote from Enthony Enzor-Demeo, the current CEO of Firefox.
I like how you treat any rumors you don't like as propaganda, implying ill intent, as well as call people morons for not trusting yet another corpo.
I personally use firefox for now, because i'm too lazy to set up synchronization between devices myself in an opensource browser.
The fact that they're slightly better than their competitors is not a reason to fanboy over them and put a blind eye over their slow but steady shift towards enshittification.
You're jumping to conclusions. I see where you're coming from, I might've been more explicit about what exactly I was talking about, so my bad ig. I wasn't talking about Fanon in the first place. More over, I wasn't talking about any book author/philosopher in particular. My logic still applies even to Fanon tho, as, first, he had unique circumstances on his hands, second, our world had changed quite a bit since then too, fyi.
I can't but notice how vague your answer about the Vietnam is. I never asked about Vietnam's success as a sovereign political structure, I was asking about the ordinary people and how all of the events affected their lives. I believe I've made this much clear the first time around.
The era of national divisions eroding is something for after the end of imperialism, in the meantime a people should be able to chart their own course free from the domination of the west.
And what's the reasoning behind that statement? I've already provided my stance and reasoning on why nationalism should go ASAP. You, on the other hand, fail to point out why deimperialization is of such high priority in your worldview.
You seem to think on the geopolitical level, while being just a person, microscopic, compared to a political structure. In modern society, any drastic geopolitical change affects individual well-being only negatively, potentially yielding positive changes in this aspect only decades later, if does so at all. Modern day imperialism is nothing compared to what it was in the past, thus deimperialization is none of our concern, as it won't give any marginal positive change on personal level.
well, it apparently was an issue for me on Mint, when i just switched from windows.
I might misremember things, but i believe some Microsoft stuff was inside PPA, so for someone just switching from windows it's actually more likely to delve into the apt fuckery.
Neither money nor states are dogmatic in their nature. They exist under some basis, that can be verified, and that defines their properties. Gods have arbitrary abilities that cannot be verified.
The only benefits of a religion are being a part of community and coping with reality. The first is not unique to religion, the second is delusional and leads to lots of misjudgement, harms one's ability to percieve and analyze the objective reality. In other words, even the benefits are quite controversial in their usefulness here.
By the way, if you think about this, religion as a coping mechanism is as widespread only because it have been a substitute for more healthy alternatives for literal milleniums.
Religion should be a thing of past, but alas, magical thinking is still strong in modern society. To get rid of religions, first and foremost we should teach people about common logic fallacies and manipulations, so they would detect and avoid them more easily
except it doesn't. Fixed release model quite easily gets in a way of doing shit. Need to add a PPA into config for each separate package you need the latest release of, or simply because the package itself is absent in the normal repo doesn't help either. And don't get me started on troubleshooting after "doing shit".
Something like fedora does a much better job if you prefer fixed release, but if you like to experiment and "do shit", arch derivatives like Endeavor or Cachy are just better suited for you. All of the above also have a much nicer documentation than Mint.
I believe that people recommending Mint do so only because they once heard that it was a noob distro themselves. When i first switched to linux, i had lots of issues with it. I especially struggled with troubleshooting. EndeavorOS was my second, and it was perfect for me until i discovered CachyOS.
enlish swearing is too simple for that