So what you're saying is in order for "AI" to write good code I need to double check everything it spits out and correct it, effectively doing all the with myself. But sure, tell yourself that it saves any amount of time.
I think the point webp@mander.xyz is trying to make is that, if I were to send you digital information and then demanded from you to delete it, one would have potentially a harder time convincing people, that it's not within your rights to demand remuneration.Especially with how US-centric and -representative the international media landscape has become.Even though in most(?) European countries I imagine (didn't actually check) I could sue you for damages, maybe reduced due to my causing the issue, should you publish the information after I asked you delete it.
But with the power imbalance at play here the police can just roll in and arrest the guy. Allowing them to be terminally stupid in the best case, or malevolent in the worst. They could just as well claim they sent someone secret information, they refused to comply with the request for deletion, so they were arrested.Depending on how little oversight there actually is, that either is the end of the story or, when asked for proof of this series of events, the "proof" was "accidentally deleted" during the investigation, how clumsy.
The cries are about how Bluesky uses it and implements the required infrastructure, not the protocol itself.