Yeah, but that would be slower. And of course everyone knows LLMs are going to solve all the world’s problems, so anything that would slow down their development is causing untold harm to people who you could have saved if you’d just ignored all other concerns and put all resources into training LLMs.
In case it was not obvious this is sarcasm
Except then a bunch of people come in with guns and kill the moose because it’s become a danger to humans
Net update size: -50MB
Pretty sure New York is at-will employment so unless there’s a clause about it in his contract I don’t think he can
Because not everyone listens to the same radio station?
They don’t have to make an LLM that can actually do your job to get you fired, they just have to convince your boss that it can.
🏴☠️🏴☠️🏴☠️
But they can only do that because others are doing traning, no? There’s no point at which you can go “okay it’s all inference from here”, the model needs to be updated with new information/guardrails/context to continue being useful for most use cases
The Roberts court has no problem overturning precedent, no matter how “upheld” it has been, so long as it is convenient for conservatives.
Fair enough. I admittedly did not notice the community, I was browsing my all feed.
Coming to the fediverse and using it to complain about reddit always feels like going on a date to complain about your ex to me
Correct. I think they are wanting this type of “local” achievements set up for games which would normally only have them through a social platform
Some games have them built in as “trophies” you can look at in the main menu
Despite how pro-AI their ownership is, imo they have the least intrusive AI options of any search I’ve used, free or not
“At least we beat vietnam”
Motherfucker, you made me check to see if I missed a release…
Immutable so long as no one party or group owns more than half of the coins on a given blockchain… then the ledger is whatever they say it is and it propagates down because they can manufacture their own “consensus”.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/1/51-attack.asp
and most use cases around things like “smart contracts” end up still requiring a trusted third party at some point
https://pluralistic.net/2022/01/30/the-inevitability-of-trusted-third-parties/
If climate change was only about snowfall, sure. But from your own source:
https://www.climatecentral.org/climate-services/billion-dollar-disasters
Since 1980, half of all (CPI-adjusted) damage costs from “major weather events” (defined as weather events incurring more than 1 billion in CPI-adjusted damages) have occurred in the last 10 years. Many of which are winter storms.
So yeah, you may have seen trends in snowfall. But the instability of weather systems is increasing due to climate change, and this storm is at least partially a consequence of that.
You could say the same for the Democratic Party establishment. Strongly worded letters are not enough.