Shitty people are bad
Shitty people with guns are worse
Shitty people with guns and their government’s blessing are the worst of all

And yeah, it’s a military. Their entire job is to kill people. But this is just a tiny bit over the top. It’s has that one more teaspoon of salt that ruins the whole pot of stew.

With Zelenskyy traveling to secure more aid to fight off Russia’s invasion, the timing is very suspect.

I see what you mean

Being unfamiliar with the media landscape in Ukraine, I have no idea whether this is investigative reporting or Russian propaganda. The timing is suspect, at the least

Looking a little behind the article, this appears to be a frivolous lawsuit by an organization with no Wikipedia page that files its taxes using EZ forms — perhaps a “non-profit” with a staff of one that operates from someone’s basement

It doesnt “threaten” the market. It eliminates it. Of course, that’s been a goal of all publishers across all media for decades. Sony is just the first games publisher to take the lesson from textbook publishers and eliminate physical media that a buyer actually owns.

They know how to attract players. If they choose not to, that’s on them

Perhaps you should look up the definition of “censorship”. You literally just described it

Until Gaia has had enough. Then the quarters never matter again

This is a ruling about content according to the quoted passage. That’s censorship of ideas by definition

Any ideas that the EU doesn’t want discussed. Support for Russia or criticism of Ukraine, for example.

NOTE that I do not support Russia or think Ukraine is wrong in the current environment. And I understand that any government wants to prevent opposing propaganda from spreading within its borders.

Is there a credible source for this? Netanyahu mouthpieces don’t impress me

There is some evidence that the environment always wins in the long term

Also not a legal expert, but

any natural or legal person directly or indirectly responsible for making available or transmitting that content to the public

would seem to catch personal social media posts as well. Otherwise, there’s still an exploitable loophole.

Aren’t EU sanctions economic? In that case, limiting RT seems reasonable. This ruling, though, seems aimed at enforcing a ban on discussing certain ideas. It’s censorship. Perhaps it’s justified, although censorship has never really worked; it’s only driven speakers underground and into dark corners where authorities can’t monitor them so easily.

Then don’t?

Is this the same Germany that thinks EU policy should be set by simple majority rule? Is it a different Germany? Did I miss something?

https://feddit.org/post/28897938

Good to know that DW survive these crazy times

Wonder if the Heritage Foundation could be persuaded to have Trump try to pry Germany out of the EU? It sounds like the bloc might be healthier without them

False equivalency. But marks for trying to leverage AI hype for the polluters

Came to post exactly this

Startling drivers while operating a vehicle on the road. What could possibly go wrong?

<smdh>