Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)C
Posts
1
Comments
67
Joined
3 mo. ago

  • Also, sealioning is “just asking questions” (JAQ’ing off). Consistently interrogating a position or POV for example, with requests for evidence. Not asking someone to provide some sort of evidence for a single claim they made in reply to another user and refusal to find said evidence for them.

    Sealioning (also sea-lioning and sea lioning ) is a type of trolling or harassment that consists of pursuing people with relentless requests for evidence, often tangential or previously addressed, while maintaining a pretense of civility and sincerity ("I'm just trying to have a debate"), and feigning ignorance of the subject matter

    Emphasis mine. From wiki. I appreciate the attempt to deescalate though and accept it’s probably time to pack it in with that particular user.

  • How about you google burden of proof? Like the other user said burden of proof is on the party making the claim. It’s not on other people to prove the claim wrong by doing research for you.

  • Sure I saw yours and accept that, but “hand your ass over” doesn’t equate to “complies minimally with legal request they have to in order to remain functioning as a business” in my book.

  • Burden of proof is on you.

  • Are you basing this on anything? I agree with another poster that proton being the go to alternative is somewhat suspect in my paranoid brain but some of these remark here seem pretty outlandish.

  • They addressed all the OPs requirement excluding remarking on the spam filter. What are you even talking about.

  • One of these can just be solved with a mailbox rule within the email client itself for what it’s worth. Make a rule that’s based on keywords in the subject line and have them moved into a folder that you clear out every couple of months. Downside is the email client need to be running/opened for it to process them.

  • Respectfully; if we aren’t close and it doesn’t come up organically in game, I’m super not interested in hearing political opinions in games. While they may have some degree of politics baked in, that doesn’t mean Im interested in hearing people interpretation of them beyond gameplay. I play games to relax and socialise in a friendly, respectful setting.

    That includes if I agree. I see this “if they don’t, they agree with the status quo/don’t want to deal/etc” used frequently but people who borderline grandstand in front of people who they know likely share their view are insufferable. At least that been my experience the one time someone has brought up politics at a table. Then again I avoid public/rand tables for a reason these days. Not saying all political discussion goes thay way at a table but the image just paints it in a very binary manner.

  • Weird thing to go to bat for but the emphasis is on material. Even if it’s generated or drawn if it depicts CSA acts it can constitute CSAM and is even treated as such in a lot of jurisdictions. Though generated more so than drawn due its appearance of being genuine. It feels like saying “this isn’t porn of Y celebrity because it’s fake”, but it’s still porn.

  • Yeah, I thought some degree of English aptitude would be required for citizenship/visas. Though it does also state he wrote in correspondence so could be just an attempt to curry leniency.

  • Oh dear

    Jump
  • I really should get matching coats for myself and my dog. And a dog.

  • The more you know, cheers for the links! The out-competing native animals angle makes sense and I wouldn’t have thought of. I have to admit, I would not have called hedgehogs being on the list lol.

  • Ah fair enough on them not being protected in NZ but I still fail to see how they can be a significant pest problem beyond swooping. Definitely not to the point of shooting them anyway.

  • Lucky you don't have a license (I assume) because magpies are protected. Why the hell you’d want to shoot a non-pest is beyond me; even they can be dickheads in mating season.

  • And I appreciate that enthusiasm! Please keep posting just consider dropping the QR next time is my 2c is all.

  • On the off chance the channel is legit; ain’t no way Im following a random QR code from the net. This was pointed out the first time you did it.

  • Nothing to see here, just the president of the US running obstruction for Russia.

  • Increased font size maybe or more likely the classic “fake text meme for internet points”.

  • The incentive is Russia not continuing to lose staggering amounts of troops invading a country they share a border with. Russia could argue civilian casualties via fog of war and other typical war crimes excuse. You don’t accidentally rape in war. The only reason you try to get amnesty for it is if it’s SoP and it’s a tool you’re preserving for future conflicts. Things like rape, kidnapping children and even gunning down clearly unarmed elderly civilians in close range should be outside of scope and not applicable for amnesty by law. I’d also put it to you that even the most morally devoid, ghoul of a human would prefer a jail cell as opposed to dying slowly from being half disintegrated by a drone. Even for the hypothetical few that wouldn’t; the rest of the combat force shouldn’t have to pay that price.