Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)B
Posts
2
Comments
490
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • i thought it was funny at the time.

  • are you sure it's not spelled sheeeeeeeiit?

  • what incentive does google have to be a faithful curator

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • preferably over the side

  • Oh. Well that settles that. After all, she'd know.

  • r/yourjokebutanarchy

  • the more you think about it the worse it gets

  • This statement is indistinguishable from a desire that politics should not take notice of genocide.

    edit: or at least should take no notice of the palestinian genocide; that the palestenian genocide is not to be compared to the holocaust.

  • Ah, no. It's unquestionable that some peoples' sense of security would be challenged by the kiffyah. What's questionable is whether their actual security is challenged by a piece of colorful fabric. Anyone can and everyone does feel any way they will. "Danger" is perfectly independent of one's sense of danger (see Horror, Genre).

  • What do you think "fighting" consists of in this context? If you think fighting is voting in a system I can see failing in real time and sporadic, controlled protest then please do us both a favor and don't bother replying.

  • but not every

  • or... they can gerrymander every other red state

  • i just googled maralago face and this was the first thing that popped up. theres better sources for sure

  • this seems to assume a baked-in 2 party system I would prefer not to continue to plan around

  • everyone's been doing it since the idea came around because it's not illegal, and it's not illegal because the people making the laws are the people benefitting from the practice. it's true of democrats and republicans in america, but only democrats to my knowledge have a history of attempting and in some cases (notably, california) actually succeeding in getting independent redistricting comittees to make this form of cheating illegal. here, check the proposed bill out directly:

    https://legiscan.com/CA/text/ACA15/2025

    notably, the bill will only take effect if other states attempt to gain an unfair advantage over them; it's only retaliatory. Also, california could redistrict every republican district but one or two in the state but has carefully chosen to only cheat the exact same 5 seats texas cheated; it's directly proportional. finally, the bill includes a sunset feature that will automatically revert to the fair redistricting comittee in 2031. California's retaliatory gerrymandering simply does not reflect badly on democrats as you seem to believe, incompetent cowards though they may in general be. and that's a fucking problem. If anything, them acknowledging that they could cheat harder but are "taking the high road" by only cheating 5 seats is the real fuck up here honestly. If you're going to cheat because the other guy is cheating, cheat better than the other guy ffs.

  • Yeah, if we want change we have to vote for the status quo party, everyone knows that.

  • What do you expect me to do? Get up off my ass and go do something?

  • "They threatened to arrest me when I delivered myself into their clutches after they told me exactly what they were were going to do and why they were doing it i am a victim 😥 now make sure u get out and vote so we can stick it to them in the midterms!"