Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)B
Posts
2
Comments
490
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • you essentially said shooting projectiles and saying bad things were the same.

    no i didnt say that because it's a stupid fucking thing to say. i dont need your hand up my ass flapping my mouth while im speaking, thanks.

    How about I call you when a person kills themself and writes their fucking suicide note with chatgpt's enthusiastic help, fucknozzle? Is your brain so rotted that you forgot the context window of this conversation already?

  • it's hard to be up-to-date with google fu these days. I tried looking for traffic data on that intersection (eg pulse nightclub traffic safety before:2025-01-01) only to find it either doesn't exist as such or is so obscure to me that it might as well not exist. visibility on the road is a very different thing than slickness i hadn't considered, granted full stop.

    I still need to be convinced that whatever paint it is they're using is actually causing the road to be slick before i retract or make any edits to previous statements, but that's definitely a more serious point in my opinion and thanks for specifying. like i could see latex as an issue but i wouldn't agree spray paint is an issue. and then the problem would be how should we both allow these people to memorialize a tragedy in such a way as to safely allow for the passage of traffic, not unilateral denial of a precedented memorial on grounds that can not at this time be shown to be supported by evidence, whatever you may say about the fallacious nature of my skepticism.

    and not for nothing, but i just actually checked and, only the headline could have its ambiguity be interpreted to suggest the memorialists were 'painting.' at least according to this article, the floridian state are the ones using paint and the pulse memorialists are using chalk, and despite the OP's headline referring to "repeainting," the images of the crosswalk show it 'painted' with chalk within that article, so actually, are you sure you didn't just read the headline and come to a 'reasonable' conclusion and 'civilly' express your '100%' support for the cause while actually thoughtlessly supporting the erasure of a tragedy's memorial for some reason?

    then, from your source:

    Visibility: High contrast improves the visibility of safety signs, making them stand out against their background. This is crucial in environments where lighting may be poor or where the sign needs to be seen from a distance.

    are you honestly suggesting a colorful pattern instead of black would tend to reduce visibility? this is the part i was saying is absurd on its face earlier. and i'm sure you'll forgive me as i return the accusation of "did you even read this?" i was not going to slap you with this earlier because it's such an obvious retort as to be insulting, but, how are you not constantly struggling with visibility on the road with all the different colors of car?

    I'd like to hear what florida state law or traffic data or the people actually using the crosswalk have to say about the matter, not this unrecognizable messageworks public interest group on the first page of a "traffic visibility" google-fu session, or some ergonomical motorcyclist who i frankly suspect will never come across this intersection in their life.

  • i didn't say they were the same, you put those words in my mouth. I put them both in the category of things that need regulation in a way that rope does not. are you seriously of the opinion that it is fine and good that people are using their ai chatbots for mental healthcare? are you going to pretend to me that it's actually good and normal for a human psychology to have every whim or fantasy unceasingly flattered?

  • you aren't stating a fact, you're speculating that colorful chalk on the crosswalk could contribute to an accident in some unspecified way. I've asked for what data could support your opinion (by way of observing its absence) and- you'll correct me if i'm wrong here- you've just agreed that in almost the decade since the pulse shooting there have been exactly no incidents that can be traced back to this potentially dangerous political statement that you 100% agree with. do i have this about right?

  • i feel like if the rope were routinely talking people into insanity or people were reliably using their unrestricted access to rope to go around shooting others yeah i might want to impose some regulations on it?

  • the person speaking doesn't get to decide how their tone is perceived. repeating "civil and reasonable" in the face of people who say you're acting oppositely in some way is unlikely to change their opinion. even if it did, there is no way to phrase "painting a rainbow onto a sidewalk makes it less visible" in such a way that your tone makes up for the fact that the claim is absurd on its face. doubly so when you're not providing traffic data to support the claim. also, 'reasonable' suggests you subscribe to some reasoning, but the 'reasoning' provided is "it’s not far fetched to think that casualties may occur." okay well, color me skeptical. why do you believe that. i'll give you civil for whatever you think that's worth on its own though.

  • not "infinitesimal time." continuously. think of it like this: to continuously think up perky tits, it takes a human mind 12 watts- brain is a 12 watt computer. time interval is proportional to the number of titty images/length of titty video. and im psure an individual instance of titty ai doesn't come out to 2.7 jigglewatts- im like 80% sure i can get a (small) titty generator to run on my lil 50 watt phone. not testing that assumption today tho.

  • No, my eyes are not little meat DSLR cameras

    actually that's a much more apt metaphor than you seem to be comfortable admitting

  • I've heard a lot of people say that, you know.

  • A lot of people are saying he raped children.

  • ok

  • Who is looking this man in the eye and calling him a liar, in public? Who is actually calling him on his bullshit, to his face?

  • should it indeed

  • i feel like the only real 'advantage' here would be that the cards couldn't be proxied which sounds like only an 'advantage' to the people on the rent-seeking end of the bargain.

  • hey. it occurs to me too late that you might have taken exception to the tone of my previous remark. i had intended it to be genuinely helpful but im afraid it came out as world weary and, well, a little unpleasant. and i didn't actually offer you any recovery resource. I just basically said "you got a problem lol gl" which is an enormous dickhead move in retrospect.

    here. check out https://smartrecovery.org/

    it's a science-based alternative to the twelve step programs you might be hesitant to join due to their religious infuence. they have lots of in-person meetings and online too. i personally get more value out of in-person but everyone has their own preference and it's nice to be able to make a meeting wherever I am.

    the general philosophy can be summed up, "you have a choice." it teaches that unpleasant emotions like anxiety are generally transient and offers strategies for coping with urges and building a balanced lifestyle. it offers a toolkit and an adaptable method.

    it does focus generally speaking on substance addiction, but recognizes that addiction takes many forms. sex addiction, gambling, shopping, intimacy, trichotillomania, and yes, phone addiction. the most recent addiction to our meeting group is a young trans woman who struggles with self-harm urges. addiction is not something to be ashamed of, and it's more common than you think.

    please check it out. you don't have to live in service to that anxiety.

  • can we get some fucking submission standards please

  • it’s about signaling to others

    close the thread

  • Anyone remember blackout for gaza? It was performative then for a much more important cause with much more public support.