He makes his position clear at 7:50 of that interview that he defers to climate scientists on the issue and continues to ask the writer "what can we do"? Which in my mind is all we can hope for in a politician.
It seems your referencing his suggested response at 8:30. But he then works off her response, that there is no clear path forward, which is inline with his previously stated position frankly.
Crystal meth is a pathway to many abilities some consider to be higher education