Yea. All of my theories on this are just based on assumption. Everything I mentioned is probable and at some degree does play a part in the numbers. Some people drive crazy, some don't charge, etc. There are some other anecdotes in this thread that support some of my claims. One comment mentioned a PHEV driver thought the battery recharged while driving, not knowing it needs to be plugged in. That's certainly a more extreme case, but I would imagine there a lots of users that drive too long between charges. IF that is happening widespread, then people are using the vehicles outside of mfg specs. We don't know the exact reason and probably never will get that sort of detail, but it's a possibility, and if it's true, that would take the liability off of the mfg imo. All speculation though.
But if 50% of iPhone users are professional mobile gamers, their utilization is an outlier skewing the sample. I'd like to see the population in the sample for this study. For the average PHEV driver, they probably get close to the mfg estimate when driven as expected but the generalized data encompasses non standard users.
ICE vehicle manufacturers don't give MPG estimates based on burning out at every stop light, driving with various octane fuels, or many other factors that can effect fuel economy. They give estimates based on a certain usage. I have a Subaru WRX and average 2-3 more mpg than mfg estimates on hwy usage. That difference is in my favor, but it still shows that estimates are just estimates based on a baseline use.
I think it's more like Apple saying you get 24 hours of battery life on an iPhone, but in reality, if you use it frequently or play games, the battery underperforms to the stated life. If these vehicles are driven aggressively or not recharged at mfg expected intervals, like fleet utilization, that would skew the general mpg for the population. I'm not saying that's what happening, but it's a possible explanation.
I would guess that the majority of the 50% of non voters willingly didn't vote, but some of that 50%, other than the previously mentioned exceptions, maybe couldn't due to disenfranchisement from purging voter roles, or since it's not a government holiday, maybe couldn't leave work to vote. I believe legally it has to be allowed, but we all know that doesn't mean that it always is, and some people work a distance from their voting station. For example, I travel an hour for work on Wednesdays, stay remote, then drive back home Thursday evening. If that happened to be on a voting day where early voting isn't possible, that could disqualify me, or at least make it really difficult to vote.
But as mentioned, I think the majority is due to apathy or ignorance, willful or not.
Are the adults consenting or is it unwanted? Do you know for sure whether it's unwanted or not? Just because you disagree with it doesn't inherently make it bad, but if it's not consentuel then it is bad. If the female needs assistance, then you can help out, but if she's fine with it, then it's not your business.
This is a big contributor to why cancer rates are elevated in Iowa. Lots of farm land means lots of chemicals sprayed. Fortunately our fearless governor, Kim Reynolds, and her band of merry assholes are trying to protect Monsanto from legal liability by making it illegal to sue them. It passed in the Senate but failed to get back through the house... So far. Not for lack of trying from Beyer and the aformentioned conservative ill running the state.
Prior to 2025 getting deported on a work visa wasn't really a fear. Most people on visas arrived before last year's election. Then, people were coming to this shit hole because there were work opportunities for them.
It's responses like these that people reference when arguing against gender rights. It's a pedantic point that just makes people think you're acting like a douche.
If you can smell someone's vagina, including your own, while standing, you should get that checked out. Perfume is not used to mask any smells, it's to add smell as an accessory.
It collapsed at the point of impact where the steel weakened, then that crushed everything below it. The evidence is all over and has been for almost 25 years now. Just watch the videos.
The only time it's been kind of relevant in my dealings is the Arch wiki, because it really is a solid resource. However, sometimes my issue is a specific one and I need more than general information on a process. RTFM ruins communities when someone is looking for support. It's just an entitled response to someone asking for help.
I remember reading something last year about how some not most facial recognition software has racist biases because the models are primarily trained on Caucasian people. Based on just the name, I'm going to assume Rajeh is not white, and may be a victim of that bias. Granted, it shouldn't be used at all, so it's splitting hairs more than anything.
Yea. All of my theories on this are just based on assumption. Everything I mentioned is probable and at some degree does play a part in the numbers. Some people drive crazy, some don't charge, etc. There are some other anecdotes in this thread that support some of my claims. One comment mentioned a PHEV driver thought the battery recharged while driving, not knowing it needs to be plugged in. That's certainly a more extreme case, but I would imagine there a lots of users that drive too long between charges. IF that is happening widespread, then people are using the vehicles outside of mfg specs. We don't know the exact reason and probably never will get that sort of detail, but it's a possibility, and if it's true, that would take the liability off of the mfg imo. All speculation though.