In a multipolar world they will have credible power projection capabilities.

No. Multipolar means everyone can have multiple independently powerful allies/enemies. It means India, ASEAN, etc. being powerful enough to step in and help ROC when westerners decide to abandon it.

There are a lot of protests in Hong Kong, but the Hong Kong protests was definitely after 2015.

Trade worth considering for Europe. Huh. So fuck the Taiwanese, if that’s good for Europe?

This kind of thinking by Westerners is why “multipolar world” as a concept is so popular.

Incredible. But I must ask… was this written by the monster?

Removed by mod

the distills are good for their sizes but not even close to being comparable to the full model in quality

your comment is extremely lemmy dot world

why tf are you still on dbzer0

most significant corruption probe involves less than 100k euros lmao

StopKillingGames should quit their petition signature gathering and pool together some money to bribe MEPs

Also true: When you do 0 AI prompts, they all cause the same amount of emissions, which is 999999999 gigajoules.

device maintains a single connection to Google server

vs

every app maintains their own connection to their server

Can humans think?

[…] reported a gross profit margin of 23.2% for the quarter, with an operating loss of 500 million yuan (70 million USD). Based on these figures, Xiaomi’s electric vehicle business posted an average loss of 6,500 yuan (903 USD) per vehicle in Q1 2025

How do you define dumping versus simply being unprofitable?

See also Brand-new colour created by tricking human eyes with laser - News - nature.com.

It’s a math trick. Not a physical theory.

thing I don’t like is on the rise

must be the tankies

tariff = (export - import) / (<??? factor> × <another ??? factor that cancels the first one out> × import)

The only times anyone would use the asterisk as multiplication symbol are

• they are doing some fancy math and it’s not the same kind of number multiplication we’re familiar with
• they are on a computer, the keyboard does not have a (×) key, and they don’t know how to typeset it (\times in LaTex), so they just use the asterisk instead

The US government falls in the second category.

As stupid as that sounds, you are not totally wrong.

@don@lemm.ee and @kopasz7@sh.itjust.works you are misunderstanding what “observable universe” means. The observable universe is defined by the particle horizon, but the universe that can affect us in the future is defined by the event horizon. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_horizon says

The particle horizon differs from the cosmic event horizon, in that the particle horizon represents the largest comoving distance from which light could have reached the observer by a specific time, while the cosmic event horizon is the largest comoving distance from which light emitted now can ever reach the observer in the future.

But even the cosmological event horizon distance is dependent on our model of the universe’s expansion, which in turn depends on the content of the universe. An event such as a vacuum collapse will drastically alter the content and the expansion rate, rendering our calculation of the event horizon invalid. So “snap changes…” may in fact be the case.

It kinda works you just gotta be careful with what you use and keep some human in the loop curating the outputs.