Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)A

AwesomeLowlander

@ AwesomeLowlander @sh.itjust.works

Posts
24
Comments
2049
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • NSFW Removed

    She must know some people in American politics

    Jump

  • 20+ years ago, and I definitely would not have consented to shit then that I love now.

    Yes, but past you did consent to shit back then (loans, etc) that affect you today, whether or not you love it. So what's the difference if the timeline is reversed?

  • NSFW Removed

    She must know some people in American politics

    Jump

  • From a legal perspective, the you of today is the same individual as the you of ten years in the future. And the you of today is perfectly capable of making binding decisions affecting future you, so my question is, why not vice versa.

    Or if you want to make it easier - if you could send a message back to yesterday, should you be allowed to do something legally binding on behalf of yesterday's you?

  • NSFW Removed

    She must know some people in American politics

    Jump

  • If I ever change my mind then so too does the status of the consent.

    Not really. I'm not talking about just sex here. There's plenty of legally binding stuff you can't withdraw from one you've agreed to them.

    They're two physically separate bits of mass

    What if tomorrow you was sending messages back in time to make arrangements on your behalf?

    with different opinions on the situation

    Yes, ask anybody who wakes up the next morning with a killer hangover if they have a different opinion of the situation.

  • NSFW Removed

    She must know some people in American politics

    Jump

  • Yes, but this question relies on the premise that they ARE the same individual, at different points in the person's life.

    Put it another way, past you can and does give consent on behalf of future you all the time. Assuming time travel ever became a real thing, there's an argument to be made that they're closely equivalent.

  • NSFW Removed

    She must know some people in American politics

    Jump

  • That's a really weird philosophical question... Can future you consent to stuff on present you's behalf?

    Edit: Everybody seems to think I'm talking about sex for some reason. I'm talking in the general sense of 'legally binding stuff like contracts'.

  • Dark energy just got even weirder and why the Universe may end in a 'Big Crunch'

    Jump
  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Yeah, that sounds really shitty. I can see why you overreacted to the joke that way. Sorry for being the trigger for your ptsd today. Hope things keep getting better for you.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Methinks you may have taken a tongue in cheek joke a little too seriously there...

  • Removed Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Pretty sure that was the intention to make the rugpull a little stronger

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • That's what happens whenever a prepper's spouse realises how much money they wasted.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Also probably don't just wander around brandishing a machete and a fucking handgun.

    I got chased off a block once because I had a walking stick, a well shaped tree branch, that some other gaggle of hobos interpreted as an inherent weapon and threat.

    Isn't that exactly why you need the machete and handgun?

  • PIC

    Jump

  • It has no context provided. Nothing in the rules requires that it be a mystery.

  • Thailand-Cambodia ceasefire begins after weeks of deadly clashes

    Jump

  • Bet the Cambodian leader is wishing he hadn't messed with Thailand internal politics right about now

  • angöry lïnt

    Jump

  • Me, I'm the stupid

  • My in laws sink faucet converges at the end

    Jump

  • Jesus, people, learn to not piss off others if you're trying to effect change for the better.

  • Hydrogen for Transportation Didn’t Fail Just Once in 2025. It Failed Everywhere.

    Jump

  • Did your periods (.) also escape along with the hydrogen?

  • In 2000, 2 years after creating Google, Stanford scientist Larry Page predicted the company's #1 priority a quarter century later.

    Jump

  • It's trash for you. It works for them because it keeps you on their pages longer

  • NSFW

    I'm on the Piefed instance Feddit.online and I've been seeing unblurred NSFW redtube clips like this one autoplay in the feed lately

    Jump

  • He asked 'which community', all you had to do was tell him an example of the !community@instance where you were seeing the issue. He didn't ask for a custom link. The only skill issue here is coming from you.

  • Powerful autocrats have a way of finding 'exceptions' to the rules

    Jump

  • Eh, even today, in Malaysia you aren't allowed to leave the religion if you were born into it, and if there's a Muslim / non-Muslim marriage the non has to convert. So yeah, the practice of forcing people into Islam is still very much alive today.