Or people with brainrot succumb to ChatGPT easily. Or maybe one then the other…

Guess that could be an indicator of which caused which.

uninformed for skeptical

Perhaps one begets the other.

The article is not fishy, you are just uninformed. They are powering the datacenter with turbines fueled by natural gas. You are right about the datacenter though, it’s beyond fishy, into crime territory. To top it all off, they have approval to run only a handful of turbines (after not even seeking approval in the first place, i.e. running them illegally), but they are running a ton of them.

Gary explains why.

*looks around* That’s a pretty big if.

Therapist: How are you?

Patient: Let’s find out.

I feel there’s a certain sad irony about the domain on that link.

The video isn’t working for me for whatever reason. I think it’s something technical on my side. I’m sure the people in it are beautiful if you think they are; you seem to have a fascination with beauty!

If you are making videos, and posting (comic) art, I assume you are into art. What kinds of art are you into? Do you make other art?

I’m sorry to hear that you were beaten by members of your family as a child. You didn’t deserve that. No child deserves that. I hope you are okay and safe today.

If you don’t mind my asking, do you relate to Betty’s words in some way because of your experience? If so, in what way?

Thank you so much for sharing your thoughts. You are helping me appreciate this comic more.

What did you relish about Betty’s dialogue? Was it amusing and/or relatable to you?

I see your point about Veronica. Do you think she might be representing society in this comic? Who or what does Betty represent, do you think?

I think maybe this comic might have something to do with the dichotomy of shame and envy. Maybe your point about society relates somehow to that dichotomy? What do you think about that idea?

What part of it was most enjoyable to you? Can you describe it, and how it relates to your life, perhaps?

In your own words, what is the context, if you don’t mind my asking? What is this image, and what is your interpretation of its (perhaps underlying) meaning?

What were the top 5 most surprising things, in your opinion, off the top of your head?

I am having flashbacks to the scene in Idiocracy where the doctor is talking about his wife.

For what it’s worth, I hereby acknowledge you are your own person.

Nailed it. Things have changed to allow cheaper (interpretable in several ways) developers to create “good enough” software as quickly as possible. If that involves inefficient frameworks, technology, and practices that unlock this, then so be it; if the “best” code is the code that makes money, and money is what corporations prioritize above all else, and there is a way to do that quicker and cheaper, the outcome is obvious and now ubiquitous. Furthermore, if nobody at the top cares, why should anyone on the ground care? The problem compounds.

Priorities are fucked.

Autopilot hasn’t received any updates for years.

Like I said, demonstrates neglect.

If Kleenex were the only ones doing facial tissue, then this could be, “toilet paper vs. Kleenex”, and you’d be wondering “why isn’t this Charmin vs Kleenex?” while Charmin happened to be the TP brand they chose because they had access to it.

Tesla is the only one doing camera-only self driving, so there’s no point in delineating the two. Lidar you can expect from any other brand, so it’s a token choice in this instance, especially for an engineering entertainment video.

Autopilot is just adaptive cruise control that keeps the car in lane.

Anyone who watches the video in question knows this statement is misleading. Autopilot also stops when it detects an obstacle in the way (well, it’s supposed to, but the video demonstrates otherwise). Furthermore, decades old adaptive cruise from other brands will stop too because even they have classic radar or laser range-finding.

If even the most basic go no-go + steer operation based on computer vision can’t detect and stop before obstacles, why trust an even more complicated solution? If they don’t back-port some apparent detection upgrade from fsd to the basic case, that demonstrates even further neglect anyway.

The whole point that everyone is dancing around is that Tesla gambled that cheaping out by using only cameras would be fine, but it cannot even match decades-old technology for the basic case.

Did they test it against decades old adaptive cruise? No, that’s been solved, but they did test it against that technology’s next generation, and it ran circles around vision not backed by a human brain.