Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)A

Asetru

@ Asetru @feddit.org

Posts
8
Comments
630
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • CPU had it coming.

    Jump

  • Why would I remove my laptop fans? They're the ones that keep up their morale and cheer them on.

  • Two Handed Swerds

    Jump

  • What's yours?

    Jump

  • ich🌲🐷🍆🍆🦶iel

    Jump

  • Klingelingeling

  • ich☂️iel

    Jump

  • Eischah

  • Discord gets improvements for video on Linux PCs and Steam Deck

    Jump

  • Never did. Doesn't change the fact that a lot of forums are now deserted and have a pinned post that points to a fucking discord.

  • Discord gets improvements for video on Linux PCs and Steam Deck

    Jump

  • I don't think there are many applications that I hate with more passion than discord and anybody who willingly chooses that garbage piece of software to further hide what used to be searchable forum content behind login walls and proprietary apis should be forced to search for a solution for a simple problem of their most beloved hobby all over hundreds of stupid discord channels for all eternity.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Which is why you need insurance if you buy That Car on a loan. So there's somebody else who will pay back the loan if you fuck up That Car.

    If That Car is worth a hundred billion dollars, suddenly that very important aspect just seems to vanish and you can just buy That Car with itself without any further securities.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • The assets of the acquired company are often used as collateral for the financing

    This is so dumb.

    "I want to buy That Car, can you give me money? I have... nothing."

    "But if you have nothing, how can we expect you to ever pay back That Car?"

    "Well, after buying That Car, I will have a net worth of That Car, so paying you back obviously will be trivial using ownership of That Car."

    "Sounds like we have a deal!"

  • King Gizzard Pulled Their Music From Spotify in Protest, and Now Spotify Is Hosting AI Knockoffs of Their Songs

    Jump

  • If anything, Germany is one country where this would actually be legal...

    Wenn das Original bereits veröffentlicht wurde und bei einer Verwertungsgesellschaft wie der GEMA registriert ist, bedarf es keiner Erlaubnis des Urhebers, denn diese verwaltet die Nutzungsrechte der registrierten Künstler. Grundsätzlich ist die GEMA allerdings verpflichtet, jedem, der einen urheberrechtlich geschützten Song nutzen will, diese Rechte einzuräumen.

    Gem. § 11 UrhWahrnG unterliegt die GEMA einem Kontrahierungszwang und dies in doppelter Hinsicht: Auf der einen Seite ist die GEMA ihren Mitgliedern verpflichtet, die ihr übertragenen Rechte wahrzunehmen, auf der anderen Seite ist darüber hinaus in der Pflicht, dem Musiknutzer diese Rechte auf Nachfrage gegen Entgelt einzuräumen. Damit ist das das Covern von verschiedenen Musiktiteln größtenteils erlaubt, auch wenn es einigen Künstlern sicherlich nicht gefallen wird.

    https://www.juraforum.de/news/ist-das-covern-von-musik-erlaubt_247126

  • Mozilla’s Betrayal of Open Source: Google’s Gemini AI is Overwriting Volunteer Work on Support Mozilla

    Jump

  • Which is entirely not the point.

  • ELI5 why I logically understand McDonald's food is low quality and bad for me but I crave it like crack?

    Jump

  • Do I look like I know what an MSG is?

  • ‘End-to-end encrypted’ smart toilet camera is not actually end-to-end encrypted

    Jump

  • ‘End-to-end encrypted’ smart toilet camera is not actually end-to-end encrypted

    Jump

  • They also said they decrypt after transit before they encrypt at rest, so it's not encrypted in between and they can look at your data. So it's not e2e if you want both ends to be you.

  • Defense Stocks Fall as Trump Pushes Ukraine Peace Deal

    Jump

  • You didn't find meaningful sources. And I certainly didn't stick my head anywhere. I read the articles. The point still stands that most of them had absolutely nothing to do with your points except their general bias. You're supposed to give meaningful sources that are relevant to the points you stated earlier. Come on, it's not hard. Except if there's nothing to back up your claims, or course.

  • Defense Stocks Fall as Trump Pushes Ukraine Peace Deal

    Jump

  • This is not about being a communist or not. You made statements, I asked for sources and all you could provide was a list of articles that were mostly unrelated to the far reaching points you made and even if they weren't consisted mostly of unsubstantiated leftist ramblings. I never said you were delusional, but if you can't provide meaningful sources for your far reaching claims then you can't expect me to go beyond illustrating how you act because there's nothing else to discuss.

  • Defense Stocks Fall as Trump Pushes Ukraine Peace Deal

    Jump

  • I implore you to move out of your echo chamber and actually pay attention to the points being obvious to anybody not being tied exclusively to propaganda pages. Some news sources aren't just for delusional tankies and a source not being exclusively Russian astroturfing crap does not mean it's wrong.

  • Defense Stocks Fall as Trump Pushes Ukraine Peace Deal

    Jump

  • So, there were these points you mentioned:

    • The west has absolutely hollowed out and looted Ukraine
    • used it as a battering ram to damage Russia as much as they could.
    • The US blew up Nordstream specifically to try to decouple western Europe from cheap Russian gas.
    • The US Empire, post-2014 Euromaidan coup, uses Ukraine similarly to how they use Israel, to secure its interests in the region.

    The first two links are about US officials discussing who they'd like to see active in a Ukrainian government and who they don't. Doesn't relate to any of your points. Maybe the last, but simply discussing which people are currently doing what in another country during a state of turmoil doesn't really say anything.

    The counterpunch link is just weird... It's just a long list of weird accusations and propaganda without any substance at all. Looking at the site, it's not a neutral news source anyway, but that, too, doesn't give any sources concerning any of your points beyond "look, western politicians visited Ukraine". Well, no shit.

    The Consortium News article starts with brandishing the opposition as a Neo-Nazi movement and disqualifies itself utterly by that within the first few sentences. Like, those are your sources? That's insane.

    The Monthly Review Online article is about the Maidan massacre. Not directly related to the points above.

    Maidan coup thread: deals with the question "Is there any credible evidence that Ukraine's 2014 revolution was due to a CIA coup". Even if the answer to this was "yes", it wouldn't be relevant to any of the points above.

    Coup details: same. Like, it keeps going on how the US influenced actors. Well, no shit. That's what politicians do. I still don't see the connection to the allegations stated above and the way it's framed in the article is despicable.

    "Don't get it wrong": "The EU doesn’t care about Ukrainian lives — in 2014, they supported a far-right coup", nah, I'm out. "Far right coup", what bullshit. This whole myth of Nazis taking over Ukraine is just ridiculous and any article that keeps iterating that Russian propaganda is not believable.

    advocating inflicting a military defeat on Russia in Ukraine... Helping Ukraine defend itself against an invading agressor because it serves your interest as well doesn't make your second point true. Russia could stop the war today if they simply stopped attacking another country. They don't. It's not the west that uses Ukraine, it's Ukraine that uses the west's interest to reduce Russian power to defend itself. You're mixing up cause and effect.

    Washington, via CIA paramilitaries, has been fighting a proxy war - bullshit. The article is about US people training Ukrainian people, not about the CIA fighting a war. Helping Ukraine defend itself doesn't mean you're "using it". If you're teaching somebody some self defense to no longer get beaten up by a bully, you're not fighting a proxy fistfight. What a stupid take.

    NYT coup coverage with CIA involvement - same.

    Nordstream US involvement evidence - long, long article that ends up accusing Ukrainian nationalists. No US involvement mentioned.

    The US harvesting Ukraine for minerals - and here it is, the one part that I agree with you and that I think is believable. And of all the points up there, this only partly backs up the last one, because "getting resources" isn't really "securing its interest in the region" (or one might argue it's even the opposite, considering historic precedence such as Versailles, but I guess Trump doesn't think that far ahead). Yeah, that sucks. But still, there is no indication of the US or any other western state being the cause here - it's just Trump, the Russian asset of all the people, trying to take advantage of a situation.

  • Migrating Dillo from GitHub

    Jump

  • þ

    Can you please just fucking stop this?