Okay, so we just define the word differently. Funnily enough, I looked it up and the English Wikipedia seems to be on your side while my native language version uses the term "exclusively". So it's just that. Then be happy with your heterosexuality that allows banging dudes, I'm happy with my version that allows me making snarky remarks about that.
With AIs, it's the same. It's not an issue if your teacher gives you an assignment that allows our requires you to use it. But using it despite not being allowed to is cheating. Same as the calculator.
The point still stands. If you get an assignment, you can use the tools that are allowed. If ai isn't allowed, using it is cheating. It's not a hard concept.
The thing is that people get a calculator after they understood how the operations work and have mastered them.
With AIs, it's the same. It's not an issue if your teacher gives you an assignment that allows our requires you to use it. But using it despite not being allowed to is cheating. Same as the calculator.
Ja. Aber das ist die Idee. Die gesamte Biomasse des Waldes bindet CO2. Und das tut sie dauerhaft, so lange er da steht.
Wenn wir es darauf anlegen können wir, sobald der Wald gesättigt ist, ja Bäume abholzen und verkohlen. Das ist dann purer Kohlenstoff, aus dem niemand mehr was machen kann. Dann lagern wir die Kohle ein und neue Bäume wachsen nach. Aber bis wir da sind sollten wir halt erstmal fleißig Wälder pflanzen.
It doesn't even resemble a consciousness. It's not even close.
Also, why are you asking your question to begin with if your answer is then just a condescending "but sometimes we can't tell AI from humans apart"? Yeah, no shit. It's been like that at least since the 60s. That's not the point. If that's all you have, then go ahead, be happy you found something "wild and so trippy". But don't ask if there are legitimate reasons to reject AI if all you want to do is indulge yourself.
It is the coolest invention since the Internet and it is remarkable how close it can resemble actual consciousness.
No. It isn't. First and foremost, it produces a randomised output that it has learned to make look like other stuff on the Internet. It has as much to do with consciousness as a set of dice and the fact that you think it's more than that already shows how you don't understand what it is and what it does.
AI doesn't produce anything new. It doesn't reason, it isn't creative. As it has no understanding or experience, it doesn't develop or change. Using it to produce art shows a lack of understanding of what art is supposed to be or accomplish. AI only chews up what's being thrown at it to vomit it onto the Web, without any hint of something new. It also lacks understanding about the world, so asking it about decisions to be made is not only like asking an encyclopedia that comes up with answers on the fly based on whether they sound nice, regardless of the answers being correct, applicable or even possible.
And on top of all of this, on top of people using a bunch of statistical dice rolls to rob themselves of experiences and progress that they'd have made had they made their own decisions or learned painting themselves, it's an example of the "rules for thee, not for me". An industry that has lobbied against the free information exchange for decades, that sent lawyers after people who downloaded decades old books or movies for a few hours of private enjoyment suddenly thinks that there might be the possibility of profits around the corner, so they break all the laws they helped create without even the slightest bit of self-awareness. Their technology is just a hollow shell that makes the Internet unusable for all the shit it produces, but at least it isn't anything else. Their business model, however, openly declares that people are only second class citizens.
There you are. That's why I hate it. What's not to hate?
Approximately 90% of the land area of Nauru is covered with phosphate deposits, with the majority strip-mined and non-arable. This has led to Nauruan reliance on processed food, high in both sugar and fat, imported from large Oceanian countries such as Australia and New Zealand.[4][2]