There are legitimate reasons to ask for an "all permissions" token, such as setting up and using a third party client. A game is not one of the things that should be asking for that though.
To be clear, and I'm kinda annoyed this article doesn't mention it at all, this case was about some idiot trying to register a copyright under his robot's name. The case isn't saying that AI-generated stuff can't be copyrighted, it's saying that an AI can't hold a copyright.
My assumption is that primary related mud slinging depresses enthusiasm among the public for the incumbent, combined with attempts at it only being made when the incumbent is relatively unpopular anyway.
It's not a thing that happens often, but as far as I can find every single time the incumbent president has had someone try to primary them, the incumbent's entire party lost the seat.
From what I've read the reason primaries aren't done on incumbents is because every single time it's been tried the incumbent lost the actual election and the seat went to the other party.
That... is what I said yes. Cameras (I said traffic because I include school zone cameras in that category) detected these cars speeding and issued a ticket to the vehicle's owner, who in these examples is probably the driver, but because the tickets were automatically issued and the cameras can't reliably identify the driver there are no points on the license.
The registered owner does get fined, and in extreme cases like this probably should have their license revoked, but overall I do actually think it's for the best that an automated system can't take away your license.
So long as there's a proper primary I don't see the harm in this, not really. I can't see her running a good enough campaign to make it through the primaries, at least not without also having a good enough campaign to beat the fascist party after Trump.
Because this data was collected from traffic cameras, which slightly limits the actions that can be taken (notably, because they can't prove who was behind the wheel there are no points on the license). IMO what you should be asking is why has the NPD not stationed a traffic cop around each of these places specifically to catch these guys.
It is specifically Tesla I don't trust, but they are also the loudest about "full self driving" by a lot. And before you tell me Tesla is better than human drivers they are the company that intentionally obfuscates any details from incident reports involving their vehicles and are the cars that have "max max mode".
Because I know I'm never going to buy a self driving car (or at least not any time in the next 20 years) I'm not particularly annoyed by the risk of me owning one. My concern is instead with someone else buying one and then hitting me with it, because I keep hearing about how Teslas specifically are way worse than a human at driving around and not getting into "accidents".
Ew, fuck off. I don't trust those things being on the road near me, not with how much worse they are than human drivers right now.
Edit: To be clear, my complaint isn't about me buying a self-driving car. My concern is someone else buying a self driving car and it hitting me as either another driver or a pedestrian.
Why bother, nuclear and renewables care equally little about oil prices and have close to identical carbon footprints.