Getting trespassed from a furniture store, I’d imagine.

Huh, maybe they were quick to get frustrated but failed to realize that would be the majority opinion, lol.

Oh snap I commented on that post! Literally every comment on it has been people pointing that out, I had a whole conversation with the OP being annoyed that people are focusing on that instead of the article itself (which IS fair from OPs side and understandably annoying), but that just highlights how stupid it is for a mod to ban you for it. Also shows arbitrary moderation that no one else got banned, dude had it in for you, definitely a PTB.

Oh agreed 100%, people tend to speak up more about a perceived error than the rest of the article they would otherwise agree with. It’s like that meme about how it’s easier to get a correct answer on the Internet by first posting an incorrect one, heh.

Obvs we need to move towards renewable energy, but let’s be specific about our terms: solar energy and wind energy are not the same thing. Both are renewable but no, wind is not solar, despite their argument that solar energy “causes” wind. It’s a nitpick sure but a weird thing to state in the article.

If they are at all aware of the world in which we live they would have fallen down the same path anyway.

You’re welcome! It helps if you read the full comment instead of stopping halfway through.

You were today years old when you found out what innocent until proven guilty means. Not just as words, but as a concept. It means even the most obviously guilty person is given the presumption of innocence until they are actually convicted. Would you like to hear some ridiculous but technically possible arguments? Maybe it was his twin brother who drugged the kids. Maybe it was a random person who looks like him. Maybe it was a faked recording. Maybe he had a mental breakdown. None likely, obviously, but each are valid defenses that need to be eliminated to prove guilt. Unless you want to live in a different legal system where they believe it is better for an innocent person to go to jail as opposed to a guilty person sometimes going free.

Less “euphemism” and more technically correct legal term. It hasn’t been proven in a court of law, and he hasn’t publicly admitted guilt, even though there is (allegedly) film of him doing it. And to be clear I’m not saying he didn’t do it, he very obviously did, but news sites (good ones) have to be specific with their statements.

That’s… oddly beautiful.

They’d just sneak back in and open a bunch of JIRA tickets that would have to be closed all over again.

My understanding is that this is just making the physical antenna less visible, regardless of location or visual factors you are correct that it interfering with anything would be a major issue which needs to be resolved.

Everywhere else it’s either called Mischief night or… nothing. But in some small parts of Western Massachusetts it’s called Pumpkin Night because… reasons!

What’s the night before Halloween called? If you said anything other than “Pumpkin night” I’m afraid you are incorrect.

Well damn I gotta know which scene got the ok? I’ve always loved that movie.

You know how hard it is to be a fan of the show NewsRadio? Joe Rogan and Andy Dick before they both went off the deep end.

I agree he’s pretty one note but I do think it works for that and Men in Black. He’s a detective in both so yeah, not a lot of range, but it was more subdued from wacky to just sarcastic in I, Robot. I do like sarcastic jerk as a character type which may say something about me.

Look I don’t particularly like him as a person but it’s hardly a controversial opinion to say he’s a good actor. That was one of his better roles imo.

Only if it’s taking me to a 24 hour showing of I, ROBOT BITCH! Sorry that was aggressive.

And Affleck was nowhere close to the worst thing in those movies…