

3·
6 days agoThey absolutely wouldn’t. Baby leftists have a genuinely hard time accepting imperialism isn’t defined by “troop movement, bad touch.” Spicy and otherwise liberals are absolutely incoherent when it comes to what is and isn’t imperialism, their worldview doesn’t allow even a coherently incorrect definition.
Democrats have actively pursued policies that would help a couple thousand a bit every time, while their base expect/imagine SocDem reforms that take a few decades to overturn instead of months. The idiot redditor.world who replied to OP proved that without realising.
Breakdown
15 years that includes Obama’s term, and it was some meagre shit that won’t even address lead in water
Saved?
Clinton repealed Glass-Steagall, neither address the actual problem
Romneycare
Did it even reduce the increase in usian greenhouse emissions? Did it bollocks.
“Tesla’s gonna save the world” is the party line from before Musk backed Trump, did you forget?
I’m keeping this whole to show the stupidity. They admit the parliamentarian doesn’t matter, still mention it, and cower behind not having the votes. If I’m the POTUS, elected spending over $1B and want some policy to pass, I’m gouging the eyes of any dickhead senator that’s standing in the way of my votes. This just goes to show the democrats don’t give enough of a shit about all this. Furthermore, $15 in 2028 or wherever it would’ve gone into effect is the same as $7.25 in 2009. Meaning this is the same shit 12 years later.
I’m guessing that means being trains fatter somehow, since I haven’t heard of Yankees building train networks at a fraction of China’s speed.
The jokes write themselves
X approaching 0 not being 0 is an abstract concern that only matters in maths or small scale physics. In political economy it’s 0.
Don’t care, try actually holding them accountable, not that it’s going to work
Reddit.world user feigns historical literacy, fails. Other breaking news: water, wet.