I personally see Elden Ring as the second-most "Dark Souls" game after Dark Souls 1. It's the first of the FromSoft soulslikes with an open world afaik, and while Dark Souls 1 doesn't have an "open" world, exactly, everything is so well-connected that it feels like an open world to me.
I cannot agree with it being clunky, at least not any more clunky than any other game in the genre. What are you referring to specifically? The combat or something else?
Interesting. How far in did you get? I think maybe if you looked up a getting started guide you might be able to assuage that trapped feeling, because Dark Souls and Elden Ring manage to feel like some of the most "free" games in my experience. But there's definitely a crushing learning curve.
I'm not jumping in on either side, but specifically going to point to this specific issue of confusion where YOU are confused.
The other person said "threat of physical escalation", you responded "in jurisdictions you can be charged for threatening it as well". In other words, what you said did nothing to contradict what they said, hence why they told you to re-read what they said. Because from their perspective, your evidence for how the courts don't necessarily align with their definitions doesn't actually say anything meaningful because you basically just agreed with them lol
It's called due diligence, journalistic integrity, and reporting the facts.
"They're a news site." isn't an excuse for not covering all the facts of the story, in fact, that's the exact reason they're being held with scrutiny. It is their job to provide as much information as possible. That's quite literally what news reporting is for.
I want to insult you because tbh your comment is really fucking dumb.
You should just be forward with which perceived genocide you don't qualify as a genocide so that people can decide whether there's an validity to what you're saying. Which genocides are we purity testing over that aren't really genocides?
I'm not engaging with this argument about constructive criticism. Welcome to the internet. Hope you can get used to it.
Getting upset and threatening to leave and take your toys with you. That is what you did. Nobody (in the royal/aggregate sense, not the literal sense) gaf.
I mean, no, they literally didn't aim it at you, and they also literally did not admit to doing so.
I would, personally, rather you stop posting, since your behaviour just kinda seems to be "unable to handle the pressures of the internet" to the point of causing and escalating non-issues to inflammatory arguments.
Unfortunately it sounds to me like you are too sensitive to be a regular poster in any community, if an offhanded half-joking comment that wasn't even aimed at you is offending you to this degree.
Yeah, for sure, man, everyone believes you have a bunch of deadly, debilitating issues that you've allowed to go mostly untreated for 25 years. Those sure are deadly conditions, you know, the conditions that you can ignore for decades.
? So you aren't?