Diese aggressiven Fragen sind absolut unprofessionell und geben mir das Gefühl, dass hier absichtlich eine offensive vorgetäuscht wird, eben damit Gottschalk auf “Harte Kante” machen kann.
Diese aggressiven Fragen sind absolut unprofessionell und geben mir das Gefühl, dass hier absichtlich eine offensive vorgetäuscht wird, eben damit Gottschalk auf “Harte Kante” machen kann.
One gets you demonetized the other gets you engagement. Capitalism wins again.
The flip side to that is great though. Imagine a few houses per street supplying batteries for more draining activities in a connected neighborhood.
Or one could do both. Reduce access to killing tools and reasons to kill.
Nobody argued that there are no other factors like social pressure. Obviously it is a problem when about half of the suicides involve a gun. Building hurdles and adding effort is needed to prevent deaths.
Most of these do not account for socioeconomic status of the test subjects or people willfully ignore them for a better narrative in derivative articles. They therefore boil down to: “people who can afford nice things live longer” Which would not be a great headline.
Most cars can be cracked with a simple receiver. A little bit of trust is needed for the convenience of society. Breaking that trust usually makes things worse for everyone.
Gas threads and water threads are opposites to each other for safety reasons. Might be part of that thought.