However, co/efficient also states that it provides research for mostly Republicans, such as Gregory Steube (R-FL)

Yup - but still. That should have happened before the big final “show us how you work” interview.

If not, then the founder should have been in those interviews.

What is this, like the third or fourth different take from the administration on this case?

Still waiting for the Supreme Court (and several federal courts) to actually do something about their order being unlawfully ignored.

Why are we blurring the faces of the ICE agents here?

They are public servants paid by our taxes.

And if the area they’re in is considered private, well then they’re criminals who are trespassing to arrest somebody without a warrant and don’t deserve any anonymity.

A friend of mine went through 7 rounds of interviews for a senior position in a tech company.

The sixth round was actual work, coming up with a preliminary plan for their first 90 days at the company in the position. It took them about a week to pull together and finalize.

The last round was a 15 minute discussion with one of the founders (who has since moved to the board and isn’t involved in the day-to-day any more).

About 30 minutes later they got a call from the recruiter saying they “weren’t a good personality fit with the founder” and they offered the role to somebody else.

I just saw that making the rounds today as well. Felt like one of those “we know this won’t be accepted so we’ll hope we don’t get caught until it doesn’t matter” moments.

These artists should give a free concert in DC on Trump’s birthday, starting when the parade does.

YouTube’s slide started the moment they decided to embrace the algorithm.

And I’m not sure of a single social media platform that didn’t begin rotting the moment they started monetizing content.

It just promotes stealing and folks taking all sorts of shortcuts to try and generate revenue.

And all their electoral votes went to Trump …

New Orleans has precogs?!?!

One of the things I enjoy is MAGAts, who like calling left leaning people “snowflakes,” losing their shit every time somebody says something they don’t like.

Feels like this should become a slogan. “86 Trump!”

Why?

Well the term originates from soda-counter slang that meant an item sold out, and has grown to mean “throw out,” “get rid of” and “refuse service to” according to the Merriam-Webster - the dictionary people.

Eighty-six is slang meaning “to throw out,” “to get rid of,” or “to refuse service to.” It comes from 1930s soda-counter slang meaning that an item was sold out. There is varying anecdotal evidence about why the term eighty-six was used, but the most common theory is that it is rhyming slang for nix.

Wikipedia adds some more context:

In the hospitality industry, it is used to indicate that an item is no longer available, traditionally from a food or drinks establishment, or referring to a person or people who are not welcome on the premises. Its etymology is unknown, but the term seems to have been coined in the 1920s or 1930s.

Military personnel might use “86” informally to refer to scrapping equipment (e.g., “That old radio got 86’d”) or ending a plan or mission (e.g., “The op was 86’d due to bad weather”). It’s not an official term in military doctrine or manuals, but it’s part of the informal jargon that soldiers, sailors, or airmen might pick up and use, influenced by broader civilian language.

Lets also not forget somebody was deported for an “MS-13” tattoo that was in fact an Autism awareness tattoo.

This is why they’re pushing back against due process. They want to be able to make up shit and deport who they want.

One of the things I enjoy is that while his office is burning around him, John continues to send out the same, boring, campaign pledge emails like nothing is going on.

I tried to get removed from the list a few times (I never gave him a dollar) with no luck.

But now I’m enjoying the completely out of touch email blasts from him and his team. Just the same playbook, plodding along, not even acknowledging that people are concerned about his mental health.

“Hey friend, it’s John. What if I told you … now give me $5.”

Great example of the problem with ‘traditional’ journalism/media.

It doesn’t “raise ethical concerns.” No rational person would say “Gee, I wonder if that’s an ethical violation.”

It is very clearly an ethical breach and bribery.

I’m also shocked at the limited reporting asking why a government would give a $400 million plane as a ‘gift.’

I’m sure the new pope is honored to have CitiesByDiana congratulating him.

Conclvave sounds like something you see a doctor about after a week locked in a room with hookers and blow.

Somebody needs to start a “It has been X days since failure by the Republicans to adhere to Supreme and Federal Court orders was met with no consequences.”

To produce their analysis, the researchers fed wealth-based greenhouse gas emissions inequality assessments into climate modelling frameworks, allowing them to systematically attribute the changes in global temperatures and the frequency of extreme weather events that have taken place between 1990 and 2019.

I do take studies like this with a grain of salt. I don’t know this organization, but they certainly have a point of view, and it certainly is reasonable to think they could have run those computer simulations to say what they wanted it to say.

Now with that said, I’d wager many of the folks in this thread are included in that 10%. The top 10% of the world makes like $50,000 a year. “Rich” is subjective and varies from country to country, region to region. Hell it can vary widely just in the US. And even in a single state (look at average wages for somebody in the NYC area versus Syracuse).

Wasn’t expecting to see that.

No realli!

Full interview is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBwCUPttprw

I really wish some of these reporters would dig in and challenge him. I get that its uncomfortable, but that’s your job.

His questions should have been:

• Do you think he has MS13, marijuana, smile, cross, skull tattooed on his hands? And not added with Photoshop later?
• Are you saying this combination of tattoos is a code to identify him as a member of MS13? Because gang experts have cast doubt on this interpretation.
• How many other MS13 members have this exact combination of tattoos on his hand? If its a sign of being a member of the gang, others should have it as well.
• Do you think a vague and symbolic tattoo is proof of belonging to criminal organization?
• Does this make your Secretary of Defense a white supremacist? Because he has numerous tattoos associated with that ideology.
• Do you have any real proof Abrego Garcia is a member of MS-13? And if so why did your administration appeal his protected status in 2019?