Oh, for sure. And I've worked with enough really sharp older people to know their words can get flubbed up when they're on the spot when even though their brains are sharp.
I don't know, I'm for sure voting Biden, but I can't say he's doing great. He's doing a little better when he's getting riled, but he sounds old - more than three years older than Trump.
Jesus Christ, the astronauts aren't stranded. The first manned flight of a new vehicle and there were some issues on the part that gets jettisoned and burned up, so they can't inspect it afterwards. They're trying to analyze it while they have it, and even with the leak they could be to there a month with no issue.
Boeing deserves the bad press they're getting on the planes lately, but this is crap.
Is it my imagination or are they moderators letting Trump go on while cutting Biden off most of the time?
I wish Biden would slow down, he's getting flustered and can't seem to find his words. Trump is just acting like it's a rally, saying whatever the hell he wants and making shit up. This is ridiculous.
We do a lot of real-time control software, and just yesterday we were taking about how the newer folks are really good at using available tools and libraries, but they have less understanding of what's happening underneath and they have problems when those tools don't/can't do what we need.
As others pointed out, there are an awful lot of people who live in places where $100-150k is not close to wealthy. A small number of large, expensive cities has a giant percentage of the population.
How is anyone surprised that when inflation stays up for a while, people find it hard to maintain their standard of living. When you compare the person making $150k to the person making $100k, it doesn't mean that they're pocketing $50k every year, it means that they're likely renting a more expensive place or paying on a more expensive car. They're likely both just living within their means and, of you make everything in life cost more, both are going to have a hard time paying their bills. It's not until you get to people who are making more than they can spend that that changes.
It isn't. We really do have a two party system. Voting for a third party that's closer to your ideology just takes a vote away from the major party candidate that's the closest to it. We have several examples in the past where a third party candidate cost an election for the closest major party candidate, and zero examples where a third party candidate came close to winning. Roosevelt came by far the closest when he ran independent in 1912 and got 27% (which is why Wilson win).
Sure ought to be easy to prove it's a hate crime. What a horrible, horrible person. What the hell is wrong with people? How can you get yourself to a point where you think it's okay to murder a 3-year-old girl?
That all makes perfect sense, and I think you're spot on.
There's another factor I've noticed, too. Like I said, I'm a manager. Honestly, when I'm home, I get more done because there's fewer interruptions. But many of those interruptions are employees popping in to talk to me. Sometimes they just want to say hi or whatever, but not infrequently it starts with "Hey, there's something I wanted to talk with you about..." and they tell me about some issue or something going on. They could email/message/call me about those things, but often they just don't.
So I think my job as a manager is more effective when we can talk face to face. I go into the office three days a week.
That sounds far fetched until you remember that they diagnosed women with hysteria and treated them by giving them orgasms. When the vibrator was invented to treat muscle pain much later, doctors latched onto them for treating hysteria to give their hands a break.
I have mixed emotions about it. I manage a software engineering team at an aerospace company. I do see some increased quality and productivity when folks who work together and colocated. But there are tradeoffs, and happier employees for sure needs to be in the trade. Our company has sites in different states, and for years and years we've grabbed the skills we need from wherever they are. That is, we've recognized that it's workable to have at least some people not colocated, and are willing to take that hit if it buys us something.
We were nearly 100% remote for the better part of two years, and it was fine. Our productivity was at least adequate. My personal feeling is that a hybrid arrangement, where everyone has some overlapping days, is the sweet spot. But I've fought for individuals being fully remote when it made sense.
Oh, for sure. And I've worked with enough really sharp older people to know their words can get flubbed up when they're on the spot when even though their brains are sharp.