• carpoftruth [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    these are neat. the energy density of them is very low compared to batteries, and concrete is a pretty high emissions material to construct (and you need a lot of it for this kind of thing). article says they’re using recycled concrete for the blocks though. hopefully learnings from this will help flesh out cases where it’s a better move over batteries or pumped hydro

    I enjoy using these in timberborn too

    • kristina [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      I was reading earlier today about how china’s solar sector is outpacing their battery production, so that’s why this exists, bad battery is better than no battery

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      I imagine low energy density doesn’t really matter in this use case, and using recycled concrete has to be incredibly cheap compared to producing efficient batteries.

      • carpoftruth [any, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        yeah if you’ve got the space, energy density isn’t so important. I’m sure the recycled concrete is used in the blocks that are lifted and those are surely cheap, but there’s also a lot of structural steel/concrete in the building itself (you need a legit structure to hold up all that mass) and there are also the cranes and associated moving parts to consider. the heavy ballast is probably the cheapest part of the whole thing.