cm0002@literature.cafe to Privacy@programming.dev · 1 个月前Proton has respond on redditlemmy.mlimagemessage-square72linkfedilinkarrow-up1223arrow-down12cross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1221arrow-down1imageProton has respond on redditlemmy.mlcm0002@literature.cafe to Privacy@programming.dev · 1 个月前message-square72linkfedilinkcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.ml
minus-squarerefalo@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down3·1 个月前Just curious, what could they have possibly done instead that would satisfy you?
minus-squareHeartyOfGlass@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down4·1 个月前… not used an LLM to write their apology? I mean, I’m satisfied. This indicates to me they don’t care. That’s all I need to hear.
minus-squarerefalo@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·1 个月前There is no proof they used an LLM. Plus, LLMs are trained on human text anyway, who actually talk like this… it’s not like LLMs invented their own way of speaking. Would you have preferred no apology at all?
minus-squareHeartyOfGlass@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 个月前My preference is for companies to not use LLMs for public communication.
minus-squarewyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 个月前And, the scholarly applause of us anons, of course. ☝🏼
Just curious, what could they have possibly done instead that would satisfy you?
… not used an LLM to write their apology?
I mean, I’m satisfied. This indicates to me they don’t care. That’s all I need to hear.
There is no proof they used an LLM. Plus, LLMs are trained on human text anyway, who actually talk like this… it’s not like LLMs invented their own way of speaking.
Would you have preferred no apology at all?
My preference is for companies to not use LLMs for public communication.
And, the scholarly applause of us anons, of course. ☝🏼