Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 天前California moves to exempt Linux from its upcoming age-verification law after backlash over forcing operating systems to collect users’ ageswww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square179linkfedilinkarrow-up11.47Karrow-down16cross-posted to: usa@lemmy.mlhackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
arrow-up11.47Karrow-down1external-linkCalifornia moves to exempt Linux from its upcoming age-verification law after backlash over forcing operating systems to collect users’ ageswww.tomshardware.comLee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 天前message-square179linkfedilinkcross-posted to: usa@lemmy.mlhackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
minus-squareboonhet@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·7 天前Also, is each docker container a “computer” of its own? After all, I could use different distro base images!
minus-squareNo1@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·7 天前You are required to have age verification. We licence our age verification on an instance basis. An instance is defined as whatever makes us the most money, or alternatively causes you the most pain. You know. A worst case scenario.
Also, is each docker container a “computer” of its own? After all, I could use different distro base images!
You are required to have age verification. We licence our age verification on an instance basis. An instance is defined as whatever makes us the most money, or alternatively causes you the most pain.
You know. A worst case scenario.