Starfield devs faced "a lot of pressure" to use Unreal Engine 5, former Bethesda artist says, but the Creation Engine won because of its modding capability

Respectful Communication: We strive for positive, constructive dialogue and encourage all members to engage with one another in a courteous and understanding manner.
Inclusivity: Embracing diversity is at the core of our community. We welcome members from all walks of life and expect interactions to be conducted without discrimination.
Privacy: Your privacy is paramount. Please respect the privacy of others just as you expect yours to be treated. Personal information should never be shared without consent.
Integrity: We believe in the integrity of speech and action. As such, honesty is expected, and deceptive practices are strictly prohibited.
Collaboration: Whether you’re here to learn, teach, or simply engage in discussion, collaboration is key. Support your fellow members and contribute positively to shared learning and growth.

cm0002@lemy.lol · 10 days ago

paraphrand@lemmy.world · 10 days ago

In the past, Bethesda has claimed that their engine allows them to move faster and do more because of their experience with it over the years.

I can see them combining that with their audience loving mods, and their embrace of paid mods as why they keep their engine.

Makes sense. But it sure does lead to the same sloppy stilted games that haven’t evolved enough to keep up with the times.

scholar@lemmy.world · 9 days ago

That’s more a writing/quest design problem than an engine problem. Bethesda games could be really fun if the stories were at all worth engaging with.