Against Israel, Against Palestine - For Class Struggle
www.leftcom.org
No stronger an image of the essence of nationalism can be seen than in the endless parade of coffins of Palestinians draped in flags. Nationalism is poison in the veins of the working class. Nowhere is this clearer than in Israel today. A working class stands divided and helpless, torn between two hostile bourgeois camps. Though the Israeli side has the entire weight of US imperialist muscle behind it this does not make the camps of Islamism and Palestinian nationalism less an enemy of the Arab workers.

Recently, I found out that Left-Communists largely do not believe in dialectical materialism. This viewpoint sounded preposterous to me, enough so that it piqued my interest to learn more about them and attempt to understand their positions. I came to find out that Left-Communists do not believe in supporting national liberation struggles. Naturally, I wanted to know what they thought about the most pressing national liberation struggle of our time, so I googled “Left-Communism Palestine” and I found this absolutely horrific article.

Just disgusting. I don’t think I need to explain why. The issues begin at the title, and it just gets worse as the article keeps going. There’s no need for me to debunk all its lies, it should be clear to any knowledgeable Marxist-Leninist and anti-Zionist.

This article really got to me, what an insult to all the martyrs who fought against the genocide of their people.

It boggles me that people follow this worthless ideology. It has not done a single thing for the emancipation of the world proletariat. Thankfully, it’s nearly completely relegated to online spaces.

Free Palestine, and victory for the Palestinian struggle.

  • dastanktal@lemmygrad.mlEnglish
    8·
    6 days ago

    Wow, these guys don’t even fuck around with Trots.

    Apparently they want to adhere to an ideologically pure version of Marxism. It’s the same shit that Gabriel Rockhill rails against in his work and Domenico Losurdo wrote extensively about these type of Marxists and how they are traitors to the revolution. Apparently this is Losurdo’s main contribution to theory according to a forward I was reading in ‘Stalin a critique of the black legend’ as a fun fact.

    • LeninZedong@lemmygrad.ml
      5·
      6 days ago

      Hmm, honestly, these purist types of Marxism are pretty annoying to me. They push idealist Marxism (which is honestly not Marxism at all in my opinion), and they expect that their idealism will gain them favors with the proletariat dealing with material contradictions? Also, are they so bad that not even Trotskyists will bother with them? That is kind of funny.

      • dastanktal@lemmygrad.mlEnglish
        3·
        6 days ago

        If you go read their about section, they swear off Maoist, Stalinism, Trotskyiam as revisionist.

        I imagine trots would still be ok with these guys based on their use of “stalinism”

        • LeninZedong@lemmygrad.ml
          4·
          6 days ago

          Ew, a mention of stalinism: a telltale sign that the person you are talking to is either some capitalist dog or some social-opportunist. No one that upholds Marxism-Leninism should use the unscientific term Stalinism (it just means “evil Georgian man” policies and theory based upon their false impressions of Stalin).