• Zombie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Oh, well if it alleviates your social anxieties and makes you feel like a big boy then by all means let’s get rid of jobs for millions of people!

      • ikt@aussie.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Sure? I would never ask someone to do a useless job just … because?

        While we’re at it we should bring back those guys who hung around all day just to stick your petrol pump in your car!

        A filling station attendant!

        EV’s are also banned because that would reduce the number of petrol pumpers

        Any other worthless jobs we should bring back to help ol mate give people jobs?

        Alarm clocks! Also now banned

        https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-35840393

        Bring back the Knocker uppers! 🤣

        • Zombie@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          Right, but shop attendants do far more than just beep your items through. As evidenced by this very article that you’ve posted. It’s not a useless job.

          Customers are not employees, we have no reason to ensure our transactions go through properly. That’s the business’s responsibility, not ours.

          Self service has a place, but not as a complete replacement for human beings entirely, as many businesses are trying to push.

          • ikt@aussie.zoneOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            Customers are not employees, we have no reason to ensure our transactions go through properly

            Except that it’s against the law to steal

            • Zombie@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 days ago

              I didn’t say steal. But if we’re going down that route have you tried telling the cops to inform people to just stop doing crime? It would make everybody’s lives much easier!

              Clearly you’ve never worked a customer facing retail job in your life. There’s always discounts, deals, and reductions that go awry on the tills. It’s also against the law for retailers to sell alcohol, energy drinks, or knives to minors, and computers can’t be held liable for that happening.

              Shop attendants have a purpose beyond just beeping your items through.

              Even your mocking example of fuel attendants is provided by a human in the modern day, sitting in the kiosk watching to approve the pump instead of on the forecourt, but there nonetheless.

              I’m all for the reduction of labour, we do far too much unnecessary busy work to satisfy the wants of the owners. But this is one of the cases where the job has a clear purpose, for customers, businesses, and employees.

              Self service has a purpose, to increase efficiencies, but not to replace humans entirely. Not to squeeze maximum profit to the detriment of everything else.

              • ikt@aussie.zoneOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 days ago

                I didn’t say steal. But if we’re going down that route have you tried telling the cops to inform people to just stop doing crime? It would make everybody’s lives much easier!

                Well this change is only happening in areas where there is high crime:

                The bakery chain - known for its sausage rolls, steak bakes and pastries - will introduce “fortress stores” in areas where it has been most affected by shoplifting.

                This means staff will hand over food and drink from a theft-proof counter in stores in areas such as West Croydon, Croydon, Peckham, Whitechapel, Upton Park, Birmingham and Wilford.

                So that means this area will have to pay more for staff and higher prices just to babysit them to make sure they don’t steal, I’m sure they’re thrilled at the value creation and jobs being created because their fellow citizens are scum


                Even your mocking example of fuel attendants is provided by a human in the modern day, sitting in the kiosk watching to approve the pump instead of on the forecourt, but there nonetheless.

                How is this comparable at all? Nobody pumps fuel for me today I do it myself, I can also clean my own windows and pump my own tires! and I don’t want someone to hang around all day to do these things for me because as I mentioned it’s a waste of a persons time, it’s not a problem for me to do

                Self service has a purpose, to increase efficiencies, but not to replace humans entirely. Not to squeeze maximum profit to the detriment of everything else.

                I don’t know what we’re talking about then, I never said replace every single employee with a self service checkout, I said I prefer them over shop attendants because they are faster and I can it myself (even without stealing)

                • Zombie@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  Good to know you think people taking food are scum, and not the businesses that are gatekeeping it behind profit motive. Your ire is targeted at the wrong people.


                  You don’t pump fuel entirely yourself though.

                  Pay attention next time you fuel up and you’ll notice there’s a delay before the display zeroes out. That delay is because a human inside the kiosk watches either through the window or via camera to confirm you look old enough to fuel up and are acting responsibly enough to be allowed to spray flammable liquid out of a hose and approves the sale to begin.

                  You may think you’re a lone wolf capable of being a big boy all by yourself but for better or worse we live in a society. Not lone individuals bravely traversing the wilds of modern human civilisation.

                  I don’t know what we’re talking about then, I never said replace every single employee with a self service checkout, I said I prefer them over shop attendants because they are faster and I can it myself (even without stealing)

                  In response to a comment about replacing employees with self service, in a mocking derogatory manner.

                  • ikt@aussie.zoneOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    9 days ago

                    Good to know you think people taking food are scum

                    Yes because if people steal food then everyone else has to pay higher prices because the cost of the food is borne by the business who simply adds it to a balance sheet and works out the minimum profit margin needed to stay in business

                    You don’t pump fuel entirely yourself though.

                    Yeah I do, I take the hose out and put it in the car myself, I don’t need someone to do it for me, nor clean my car windshield or tires

                    I’m aware there is a human who approves to start the fuel pump, this is a separate job

                    In response to a comment about replacing employees with self service, in a mocking derogatory manner.

                    lets go over this again:

                    With the right thing being “not replacing 3 members of staff with self-service shelves or tills”?

                    i prefer self checkout because it’s far faster and easier and I’m a big boy who can pay for the items I purchase

                    replacing 3 members of staff does not imply replacing all members of staff

                    You’re arguing against a strawman you have made