Communist_Synthesizer@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 个月前Figure it out, you self-righteous hack.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square112fedilinkarrow-up1307arrow-down1148file-text
arrow-up1159arrow-down1imageFigure it out, you self-righteous hack.lemmy.worldCommunist_Synthesizer@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 个月前message-square112fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareVaryk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down9·edit-24 个月前you think israel should complete their genocide…and the genocide of palestine will improve global warming. your critical reasoning and your regular reasoning is critically flawed and objectively inaccurate.
minus-squareCommunist_Synthesizer@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down23·4 个月前I don’t feel like retyping my last comment, so just click my name and read my most recent one.
minus-squareVaryk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down4·edit-24 个月前i read it, seems completely irrelevant to the topic. you should slow down, your post and comments are not making any sense.
minus-squareCommunist_Synthesizer@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down20·4 个月前It’s not a hard argument to follow. The problem might be on your end.
minus-squareVaryk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down4·edit-24 个月前not hard to follow, and not correct. a palestinian genocide does not prevent millions of climate-related deaths.
minus-squarePugJesus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down5·4 个月前I think there’s definitely some miscommunication here, rather than just misinterpretation. I don’t think Varyk is in opposition to your essential point.
you think israel should complete their genocide…and the genocide of palestine will improve global warming.
your critical reasoning and your regular reasoning is critically flawed and objectively inaccurate.
I don’t feel like retyping my last comment, so just click my name and read my most recent one.
i read it, seems completely irrelevant to the topic.
you should slow down, your post and comments are not making any sense.
It’s not a hard argument to follow. The problem might be on your end.
not hard to follow, and not correct.
a palestinian genocide does not prevent millions of climate-related deaths.
I think there’s definitely some miscommunication here, rather than just misinterpretation. I don’t think Varyk is in opposition to your essential point.