mudkip@lemdro.id to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoSent this to my friends flexing a "top 65%" score. The site didn't make it clear that's not a good thing.files.catbox.moeimagemessage-square157linkfedilinkarrow-up1391arrow-down135
arrow-up1356arrow-down1imageSent this to my friends flexing a "top 65%" score. The site didn't make it clear that's not a good thing.files.catbox.moemudkip@lemdro.id to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square157linkfedilink
minus-squareMothra@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down1·2 days agoEh… It says that in a room with a thousand people you would be smarter than 345 of them. That’s the same as saying in a ranking where no. 1000 is the smartest and no.1 is pretty much the dumbest person, you would be number 346.
minus-squareSquizzy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down20·2 days agoThat is the inverse of what it says
minus-squaretamal3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down1·2 days agoHow do you figure?.. Is this an IQ joke? in a room of 1000, where you are smarter than 345 people, you are also dumber than 654 people. You’d be the 346th dumbest person. Edit: Change 346 to 345.
minus-squareSquizzy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 days agoPoor reading comprehension, I read the scale as smart to supid 1 to 1000
Eh… It says that in a room with a thousand people you would be smarter than 345 of them.
That’s the same as saying in a ranking where no. 1000 is the smartest and no.1 is pretty much the dumbest person, you would be number 346.
That is the inverse of what it says
How do you figure?.. Is this an IQ joke? in a room of 1000, where you are smarter than 345 people, you are also dumber than 654 people. You’d be the 346th dumbest person.
Edit: Change 346 to 345.
Poor reading comprehension, I read the scale as smart to supid 1 to 1000