A bold headline meant to entice attention while also reflecting the content of the article accurately is not called a “clickbait”, it is called a good headline.
Because people are still trying to weasel themselves out of responsibility and the title gets infront of the arguments and clearly states that, Yes, every peaceful person of a genocidal group needs to make a meaningful distinction between them and the genocider. This has not happened on a large enough scale within jewish communities to matter.
I would say that part of the article is about those exact people who are offended by the title.
Thanks for this comment. I said basically the same thing and got heavily downvoted. Started to feel like I was taking crazy pills. And by the way, I read it, it’s the former.
The title is supposed to inform you about what you’re going to read. That’s what titles and headlines are for. This one is telling me that either:
or
I have no reason to give the article or its author my time, attention or engagement in either case. But happy to discuss the stupidity of the title.
A bold headline meant to entice attention while also reflecting the content of the article accurately is not called a “clickbait”, it is called a good headline.
Because people are still trying to weasel themselves out of responsibility and the title gets infront of the arguments and clearly states that, Yes, every peaceful person of a genocidal group needs to make a meaningful distinction between them and the genocider. This has not happened on a large enough scale within jewish communities to matter.
I would say that part of the article is about those exact people who are offended by the title.
It’s a good headline if:
Thanks for this comment. I said basically the same thing and got heavily downvoted. Started to feel like I was taking crazy pills. And by the way, I read it, it’s the former.