return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 个月前Cyberattack on vehicle breathalyzer company leaves drivers stranded across the UStechcrunch.comexternal-linkmessage-square115linkfedilinkarrow-up1447arrow-down15cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.sepulse_of_truth@infosec.pub
arrow-up1442arrow-down1external-linkCyberattack on vehicle breathalyzer company leaves drivers stranded across the UStechcrunch.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 个月前message-square115linkfedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.sepulse_of_truth@infosec.pub
minus-squareRekorse@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 个月前Interlock devices are the bare minimum if you insist on allowing people who have proven they will drive drunk to continue to drive.
minus-squareplz1@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·2 个月前I was arguing with the point of “repeatedly” being a determining factor for having to have this device. It’s not reality, once is enough.
minus-squarehardcoreufo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 个月前Yes, once is enough. Repeatedly should get you banned from driving.
minus-squareRekorse@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 个月前When you consider that most people get away with a crime dozens of times at least before getting caught, then yes being caught once is enough.
Interlock devices are the bare minimum if you insist on allowing people who have proven they will drive drunk to continue to drive.
I was arguing with the point of “repeatedly” being a determining factor for having to have this device. It’s not reality, once is enough.
Yes, once is enough. Repeatedly should get you banned from driving.
When you consider that most people get away with a crime dozens of times at least before getting caught, then yes being caught once is enough.