• magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I don’t think most people would sit around and accept being beaten by a crowd of randos was my point.

      Like you can commit to an act of self preservation while understanding you’re not some paragon of justice, rather another animal that got backed into a corner. Whether or not self defence is the moral choice, I think its probably the most human one. I don’t think we can fault people for making that choice.

      That also doesn’t mean you have to be some bloodthirsty weirdo who jerks off to r/justiceporn to see that nuance.

      • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah I was pointing more towards the fact that someone’s gender or sexuality should not determine whether you are going run them over.

        I thought I made that clear with the transhom thing.

        • magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          My point was to drive home for a predominantly leftist and queer-friendly fediverse, that if put in the same situation, they would probably be doing the same shit. As a trans woman myself, I can tell you that the fear of being hate crimed by a cis straight dude is very real. It is much more likely that we’d be victimized by cis dudes, than other trans folk, or even cis women for that matter.

          By framing it from a familiar prospective, it makes it easier to see the point of view of those we might not agree with. That’s why I used that specific example.