• Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    I thought that was the way for them to say it was more of a passion project than a full AAA film. Like, when directors know the material and do a trial run of what their view is to test the waters for a massive sequel.

    Also probably cheaper.

      • Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I mean, it probably will be cheaper while also being a logical move for what could be a dope passion project.

        Good movies don’t need big name actors to be good, they need a good story, good world, and a cast that can pull off the immersion with a director that knows how to harness it all together. Big name actors are just a draw and I would argue a lot of the time they don’t help so much as ruin immersion a bit.

        Like in nineteen ninety-eight when the undertaker threw mankind off the top of hell in a cell.

              • Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                Yeah but you could say the same about a lot of people. Doesn’t mean it’s a “good movie” so much as a lot of people want to see that person in a thing and would pay regardless of what the thing is.

                That’s the attitude that gives us the race to the bottom in creative work