The blue LED was supposed to be impossible—until a young engineer proposed a moonshot idea.

  • muix@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I was working for a place that was the market leader in a certain niche of simulation software. Their simulation was about 10x more efficient than their competitors. However, that version of the software is strictly off limits for the public, and made a version which they sold with a sleep statement so that it was only 1.1x faster than the next best solution. That way they could remain market leaders any time the competitors released a better version. Even though many systems rely on growing simulations to simulate bigger scenarios that could help save lives.

    Just an example of capitalism impeding progress.

      • muix@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Exactly why I left that company.

        Specifically free (libre) licences, as permissive licences allow corporations to improve/adapt the software without contributing back to the community.

        I only work on software with GPL compatible licences now.

        • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          free software is. open source is an attempt to sell free software out to capitalist interest.

          eric raymond and the OSI are not good.

              • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Yeah, I guess the original statement was too broad, but any FOSS using a GPL license effectively is. I guess not anti-capitalist though, but un-capitalist. It doesn’t try to remove capitalism, it tries to be seperate from it.