• PunnyName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Just know, hurricanes aren’t just stormy, they have what’s known as a storm surge. The lower pressure effectively sucks the water up multiple feet, causing a rise in sea level. So you now have a body of water with a whole new height moving toward and over everything.

    Kind of how a tsunami isn’t just a little extra water moving inland, it’s a whole section of the ocean being displaced…and with the path of least resistance being over land (because air is compressible, while water is significantly more difficult to compress), you’re gonna have a bad time.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      I was here for it - Beryl took out the whole city, even the parts far, far away from the effects of the storm surge. One would expect chaos on the coast, but not inland. 70-90mph gusts are common enough (multiple times per year) that the grid should be resilient to them, but it simply isn’t. Blatant infrastructure mismanagement.

      • protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        My family’s there too, and I grew up there, and I couldn’t disagree more. “70-90mph gusts” cause serious damage to trees, homes, and power lines, but they’re highly localized, and so the damage is easy to repair. Houston just experienced 60-70mph sustained winds with gusts up to 90 and a number of tornadoes across the entire metro for like 2+ hours, which caused destruction several orders of magnitude greater than what you’re comparing it to. All that is to say Centerpoint Energy definitely got caught with their pants down, which had the outage dragging on for a lot of their customers

        • Pennomi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 months ago

          No doubt it should be considered extreme weather. But since things like this happen with regularity, the infrastructure should be engineered to handle it.

          It’s likely cheaper for them to ignore the problem, however.

          • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            There is no place on the planet that is hurricane proof. They’re the most power thing on planet earth. Texas is infrastructurally in the dark ages but California would be left in the dark too if a catogory 1 or 2 made direct landfall. And I say this as someone who’s lived in the mid Atlantic

              • protist@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                In recorded history, California’s only had one hurricane to ever make landfall, in 1858

            • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Many places on Earth are hurricane proof. They’re mostly in the South Pacific where the US military built most of the infrastructure.

              Have you ever heard of Guam being fucked up by a hurricane? No, because all the buildings are concrete blocks. They just close the storm shutters. Here’s a Cat 4 that directly hit the island with no deaths and no significant injuries:

              https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/25/weather/guam-typhoon-mawar-damage-thursday/index.html

              • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                Guam is not hurricane proof.

                Typhoon Mawar

                Despite being the strongest storm to strike the island in over 20 years, overall structural damage was relatively limited. However, the typhoon’s powerful winds did defoliate and uproot trees, topple billboards, and tear tin roofing from buildings. Floodwaters in Yona were reported to be waist-deep. Guam Memorial Hospital suffered some damage as typhoon shutters gave out, walls collapsed, and windows broke. Torrential rains pouring through damaged areas of the building caused staircases to flood with water. The hospital’s kitchen caught fire during the storm, leaving it useless.[88] Four piers operated by Mobil were damaged at the Port of Guam. Along Piti Channel, three barges, two mobile crane barges, and a derelict vessel were grounded. Two tugboats sank during the storm, forcing crew members to abandon ship. A dry dock at Cabras Island sank. The Sumay Cove Marina at Naval Base Guam suffered damage. Navy Rescue 21 Search and Rescue towers were rendered inoperable

                President Joe Biden declared Guam a major disaster area on May 27, enabling the distribution of federal funds. A total of 150 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) personnel were on the island by this point. Guam Delegate James Moylan penned a request to FEMA for the distribution of supplies from a warehouse containing over 1 million units of water and 900,000 meals.

                Damages from Mawar to businesses were estimated to be US$111.8 million, The Guam Memorial Hospital’s reported damages were at least US$12 million, and The Port Authority of Guam has estimated US$8.2 million in damages, excluding the assessments of fuel piers. A prison in Guam sustained US$2 million.