That’s it, that’s the joke.

    • ranzispa@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      He paid for the research. While I do agree, this is very common in academia. The PI will most often be last author even if he didn’t read the paper.

      • Cat_Daddy [mirror/your pronouns]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        The PI should definitely be on the paper. But the president of the company should not. He’s not the PI. At the lab where I work, if you didn’t participate in the research, you don’t go on the paper. I don’t throw Donald Trump on there, why should they put Elon on there? There’s a lot of people paying for research who aren’t listed as authors. I’ve literally never put a funder as an author. I’ve mentioned it at the end in an acknowledgement section, but not authorship.

        • ranzispa@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          PIs often have no idea what people in their group are actually working on. They may at times just give a general direction of what research should be about. It is common for people doing research for a company to list the CTO or whatever relevant figure as author. The fact that you do not do it reveals nothing regarding the fact that this is quite common practice.