• Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I could see where, if the trailer has good brakes and a relatively light load, it could provide additional stopping power.

    That’s usually not going to be the case though.

    • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m reasonably sure that you’ll never stop sooner, you’ll likely be exceeding the traction from the tires at that point anyway.

      The trailer wasn’t braked.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        It is my understanding that there are two types of brakes you’ll find on trailers, the ones activated by a weight that swings forward under the force of the truck’s braking, and electric ones. Neither are anti-lock or anything fance, and neither are really designed to provide actual stopping power, the drag they add is meant to help maintain control. Most of the braking force is done by the truck’s front wheels.

        I don’t think it’s impossible for there to be a spot on the performance envelope where you’ll stop a few feet shorter with a lightly loaded trailer, but I bet it’s not particularly large.

        It is impossible with a trailer with no brakes.

        • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Hence the “stupidest thing” :-)

          There might be a way to load a trailer with perfectly spherical chickens and brake a certain way that maximized braking performance to… get a MythBusters result.

          I assure you, that argument is exclusive to this forum, and wasn’t part of the dialog in the car at the time :-)