chraebsli@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 5 months agoStop comparing programming languagesprogramming.devimagemessage-square183fedilinkarrow-up1727arrow-down155file-text
arrow-up1672arrow-down1imageStop comparing programming languagesprogramming.devchraebsli@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 5 months agomessage-square183fedilinkfile-text
Stop comparing programming languages Python is versatile JavaScript is powerful Ruby is elegant C is essential C++ Java is robust
minus-squarexigoi@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 months agoWhat’s the point of having a function in the standard library if the universal recommendation is to never use it?
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-25 months agoIs that the recommendation? This is the first time I’ve actually seen it discussed. I’m wondering at this point if a new, different stdlib would be better. Or just use Rust.
minus-squarexigoi@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 months agoTo be honest, my comment probably applies more to gets, but the point is the same.
What’s the point of having a function in the standard library if the universal recommendation is to never use it?
Is that the recommendation? This is the first time I’ve actually seen it discussed.
I’m wondering at this point if a new, different stdlib would be better. Or just use Rust.
To be honest, my comment probably applies more to
gets
, but the point is the same.