Oh, it is the mines treaty.

Yeah, it is great to not use (anti personnel or otherwise) mines, until you find yourself in an actual war, then those things are extremely useful, as proven again and again in Ukraine.

      • Belly_Beanis [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        26 days ago

        Like the one good thing the British royal family ever did was give Princess Diana a platform and resources to end/remove landmines. It’s like that commercial about a landmine going off during a soccer game.

  • emdash [comrade/them, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    I love the episode of DS9 where the Fedseration are like “let’s mine the wormhole!” and everyone thinks it’s a great idea. I was like “wait, isn’t that a war crime?” when I watched it.

    Their monstous, civilian-killing weapons of fascism; our glorious, freedom-defending defensive grid.

  • CarbonScored [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    This whole thread is pure brainworms

    1992 was an incredibly optimistic time. The Cold War was over … everyone had happily realised that Western liberal democracy was the final form of human government

    pooh-wtf

    The treaty doesn’t even ban all mines, just the fucking stupidly dangerous kinds.

    • sisatici [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      Just because USA made sure yetsin stood, made sure putin is his successor, does not mean they have to admit any responsibility when things go bad. Fucking everyones business up does not mean I have to held liable for consequences. With great power comes no responsibility. Oh BTW Russia is bad for making Trump the president

    • PKMKII [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      The “success” of the post-Soviet Baltic states is the ultimate case of “line go up thinking.” Yes, they had a massive brain drain and QoL factors all caved out, but they got “fiscally responsible” and the GDP per capita shot up due to mass wealth concentration.

      • CTHlurker [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        26 days ago

        The Baltics managed to achieve a high GDP per capita in a less direct way than the Gulf slaver states. If you just don’t count poor people, then your GDP per capita is going to enormous. In case of the Baltics, those too poor to benefit the stats just happened to leave the millisecond they had the chance to.