dwazou@lemm.ee to

science@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days ago

Is red meat bad for health? Meta-study of 44 studies finds results depend on the sponsor. If the sponsor is impartial, studies find it's bad. Studies sponsored by the meat industry find the opposite

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

577

Is red meat bad for health? Meta-study of 44 studies finds results depend on the sponsor. If the sponsor is impartial, studies find it's bad. Studies sponsored by the meat industry find the opposite

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

dwazou@lemm.ee to

science@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days ago

Industry study sponsorship and conflicts of interest on the effect of unprocessed red meat on cardiovascular disease risk: a systematic review of clinical trials - PubMed

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

This trial for systematic reviews or meta-analyses was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42024525197 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=525197).

Chat

cortex7979@lemm.ee
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
2
arrow-down
1·
19 hours ago

unless they can control for sugar and carbohydrate intake as a factor.

But they can, lol
- jet@hackertalks.com
  link
  fedilink
  English
  arrow-up
  2·
  13 hours ago
  Oh that is great news, can you point me at that epidemical study?

science@lemmy.world

science@lemmy.world

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !science@lemmy.world

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

623 users / day
2.47K users / week
4.19K users / month
10K users / 6 months
3 local subscribers
18.7K subscribers
1.32K Posts
9.66K Comments
Modlog