The series of still photographs taken from surveillance camera video shows the fuselage, containing the engine and rotors, separating from the helicopter’s tail. The rotor blades and the transmission then detach from the cabin that’s carrying the passengers and the pilot.

The images were included in the preliminary report about the flight released by the National Transportation Safety Board.

“Several witnesses described hearing several loud ‘bangs’ emanating from the helicopter before it broke up and descended into the river,” the report says.

Justin Green, an aviation lawyer and former Marine helicopter pilot, said the sequence of images shows the helicopter yawing severely and the tail boom failing, suggesting it was most likely struck by the aircraft’s main rotor blades during flight.

  • thevoyagekayaking@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 个月前

    This was an extremely high hour machine, 13,000 on the airframe and 26,000 on the engine. Not sure if that’s significant, but it’s definitely interesting.

    • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 天前

      Low for commercial. Moderate to high hours for general/private. The start of the catastrophe was the bolt holding the fuselage to the empennage (tail section) shearing off. Short sheeting maintenance seems to be the likely cause. Big no, no for reasons like this.

  • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    30 天前

    … the tail boom failing, suggesting it was most likely struck by the aircraft’s main rotor blades during flight.

    I didn’t even know that was physically possible

      • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        30 天前

        That I could see. The way I read it, that wasn’t the order of operations and I thought that, for some reason, it could intentionally be pitched in such a way.

    • DickFiasco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      30 天前

      Normally the main rotor’s range of motion is intentionally limited such that this can’t happen, but through a combination of rapid changes in pitch and extreme control inputs, the main rotor can flex enough to contact the tail boom.

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    30 天前

    Helicopters freak me the fuck out… At least in a fixed-wing plane, if the engines go out, you can glide. Helicopters just become fucking projectiles.

    • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      30 天前

      Depends on the airplane. My brother used to fly a stunt plane. It was designed such that he had to wear a parachute just to sit in it properly. If the engine quit, it had the glide characteristics of a rock…

    • mrcleanup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      30 天前

      Helicopters can glide too it’s just a little harder. When a helicopter loses power and needs to glide the first step is to aim it at the ground to pick up speed…

      Step 2 is to pray you have the height to pull it off.

      • Amanduh@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        30 天前

        Psh loss of a tail rotor is easy, the helicopter basically becomes a plane. I have handled that exact scenario countless times in arma reforger :)

    • thevoyagekayaking@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 天前

      Helicopters can autorotate, meaning fly without power, and the Jetranger from my understanding has quite good autorotation characteristics.

      If this was simply a power failure, they should have been able to land just fine.